Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards

被引:122
作者
Lonergan, DC [1 ]
Scott, GM [1 ]
Mumford, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15326934crj1602&3_7
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Recent research has begun to stress the influence of evaluation on creative thought. The authors begin this article by arguing that the evaluation of new ideas is a complex process involving forecasting, appraisal, and revision, where different standards might be applied to different ideas during appraisal and revision. The influence of appraisal and revision standards on creative problem solving was examined by asking 148 undergraduates to appraise and revise highly original, original, and nonoriginal ideas generated for an advertising campaign under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed the generation of new ideas or under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed efficiency of current operations. It was found that better plans for these advertising campaigns were obtained when generative, or innovative, criteria were applied to less original ideas and when implementation efficiency, or operating, criteria were applied to more original ideas. It was concluded that evaluation may serve to remediate deficiencies in ideas but that the standards applied must vary with the nature of the idea and the context in which it is to be implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 246
页数:16
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SCI RES EFFECTIVENES, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-0275-2_5
[3]   The case for domain specificity of creativity [J].
Baer, J .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1998, 11 (02) :173-177
[4]   The innovation imperative - The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams [J].
Bain, PG ;
Mann, L ;
Pirola-Merlo, A .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2001, 32 (01) :55-73
[5]   OPTIMAL IDEATION EVALUATION RATIOS [J].
BASADUR, M .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1995, 8 (01) :63-75
[6]   Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model [J].
Basadur, M ;
Runco, MA ;
Vega, LA .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2000, 34 (02) :77-100
[7]   PROCESS-ANALYTIC MODELS OF CREATIVE CAPACITIES - OPERATIONS INFLUENCING THE COMBINATION-AND-REORGANIZATION PROCESS [J].
BAUGHMAN, WA ;
MUMFORD, MD .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1995, 8 (01) :37-62
[8]   A FACTOR-ANALYTIC STUDY OF PLANNING ABILITIES [J].
BERGER, RM ;
GUILFORD, JP ;
CHRISTENSEN, PR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1957, 71 (06) :1-31
[9]   Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts [J].
Brophy, DR .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1998, 11 (02) :123-150
[10]   Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation [J].
Button, SB ;
Mathieu, JE ;
Zajac, DM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (01) :26-48