Systematic overview of co-proxamol to assess analgesic effects of addition of dextropropoxyphene to paracetamol

被引:66
作者
Po, ALW [1 ]
Zhang, WY [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Ctr Evidence Based Pharmacotherapy, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.315.7122.1565
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of paracetamol-dextropropoxyphene combination and paracetamol through a systematic overview of randomised controlled trials. Design: Systematic retrieval of trials of paracetamol-dextropropoxyphene, paracetamol, and placebo to allow pooling of results from head to head comparison trials and single active placebo controlled trials. Subjects: 2231 patients with postsurgical pain, arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain reported in 26 randomised controlled trials. Main outcome measures: Sum of difference in pain intensity; response rate ratio and difference in response rate with response defined as moderate to excellent pain relief; and rate ratio and rate difference of side effects. Results: The difference in pain intensity between paracetamol-dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol was 7.3% (95% confidence interval -0.2 to 14.9). The response rate ratio for the combination and paracetamol was 1.05 (0.8 to 1.3) on the basis of the head to head trials. Indirect comparisons produced quantitatively consistent results. Compared with placebo, the combination produced more dizziness (3.1; 1.1 to 8.9) whereas paracetamol resulted in more drowsiness (1.8; 1.1 to 2.9). Conclusion: On the basis of data on analgesic efficacy and acute safely in both head to head and indirect comparisons, there is little objective evidence to support prescribing a combination of paracetamol and dextropropoxyphene in preference to paracetamol alone in moderate pain such as that after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1565 / 1571
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
BEAVER WT, 1987, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V41, P180
[2]  
BEAVER WT, 1978, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V23, P108
[3]  
BEAVER WT, 1984, HUM TOXICOL, V3, P191
[4]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[5]  
BLOOMFIELD SS, 1981, CURR THER RES, V30, P139
[6]   DIFLUNISAL IN POST-EPISIOTOMY PAIN - PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE-STUDY [J].
BUCK, ME ;
PAINTIN, DB .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1978, 5 (07) :548-549
[7]   THE NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT - A CLINICALLY USEFUL MEASURE OF TREATMENT EFFECT [J].
COOK, RJ ;
SACKETT, DL .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6977) :452-454
[8]  
COOPER S A, 1991, Journal of Clinical Dentistry, V2, P70
[9]  
Cooper S A, 1986, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V7, P580
[10]  
COOPER SA, 1981, J ORAL SURG, V39, P21