Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant

被引:160
作者
Broering, DC
Hillert, C
Krupski, G
Fischer, L
Mueller, L
Achilles, EG
Esch, JSA
Rogiers, X
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Radiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
portal vein embolization; portal vein ligation; extended liver resection; remnant liver volume;
D O I
10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00122-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of right portal vein embolization (PVE) vs. right portal vein ligation (PVT) for induction of hypertrophy of the left lateral liver lobe before extended right hepatectomy. Thirty-four patients with primary or secondary liver tumors and estimated remnant functional liver parenchyma of less than 0.5% of body weight under-went either right PVE (transcutaneous, n = 10; transileocolic, n = 7) or right PVL (n = 17). Liver volume was assessed by CT scan before occlusion of the right portal vein and prior to resection. There were no deaths. The morbidity rate in each group was 5.8% (PVE, I abscess; PVL, I bile leak). The increase in liver volume was significantly higher after PVE compared with PVL (188 81 ml vs. 123 +/- 58 ml) (P = 0.012). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter after PVT in comparison to PVL (4 2.9 days vs. 8.1 +/- 5.1 days; P < 0.01). Curative liver resection was performed in 10 of 17 patients after PVE and I I of 17 patients after PVL. PVT and PVL were found to be feasible and safe methods of increasing the remnant functional liver volume and achieving resectability for extended liver tumors. PVT results in a significantly more efficient increase in liver volume and a shorter hospital stay. (C) 2002 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 913
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects
    Abdalla, EK
    Hicks, ME
    Vauthey, JN
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (02) : 165 - 175
  • [2] HEPATIC RESECTION FOR PRIMARY AND METASTATIC TUMORS
    ATTIYEH, FF
    WICHERN, WA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 156 (05) : 368 - 372
  • [3] Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver
    Azoulay, D
    Castaing, D
    Krissat, J
    Smail, A
    Hargreaves, GM
    Lemoine, A
    Emile, JF
    Bismuth, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (05) : 665 - 672
  • [4] Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization
    Azoulay, D
    Castaing, D
    Smail, A
    Adam, R
    Cailliez, V
    Laurent, A
    Lemoine, A
    Bismuth, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (04) : 480 - 486
  • [5] AZOULAY D, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V181, pA267
  • [6] BAERE T, 1993, RADIOLOGY, V188, P73
  • [7] BOZZETTI F, 1992, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V39, P237
  • [8] Is radical hepatic surgery safe?
    Brancatisano, R
    Isla, A
    Habib, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (02) : 161 - 163
  • [9] CUNNINGHAM JD, 1994, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P1050
  • [10] Analysis of 100 consecutive hepatectomies: Risk factors in patients with liver cirrhosis or obstructive jaundice
    Das, BC
    Isaji, S
    Kawarada, Y
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 25 (03) : 266 - 273