Deriving land surface temperature from Landsat 5 and 7 during SMEX02/SMACEX

被引:176
作者
Li, FQ
Jackson, TJ
Kustas, WP
Schmugge, TJ
French, AN
Cosh, MH
Bindlish, R
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Hydrol Sci Branch, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
land surface temperature; Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper; Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A sequence of five high-resolution satellite-based land surface temperature (T,) images over a watershed area in Iowa were analyzed. As a part of the SMEX02 field experiment, these land surface temperature images were extracted from Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) thermal bands. The radiative transfer model MODTRAN 4.1 was used with atmospheric profile data to atmospherically correct the Landsat data. NDVI derived from Landsat visible and near-infrared bands was used to estimate fractional vegetation cover, which in turn was used to estimate emissivity for Landsat thermal bands. The estimated brightness temperature was compared with concurrent tower based measurements. The mean absolute difference (MAD) between the satellite-based brightness temperature estimates and the tower based brightness temperature was 0.98 degreesC for Landsat 7 and 1.47 degreesC for Landsat 5, respectively. Based on these images, the land surface temperature spatial variation and its change with scale are addressed. The scaling properties of the surface temperature are important as they have significant implications for changes in land surface flux estimation between higher-resolution Landsat and regional to global sensors such as MODIS. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 534
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] ADLERGOLDEN S, 1999, SPIE P IMAGING SPECT, V5, P61
  • [2] Landsat TM and ETM+ thermal band calibration
    Barsi, JA
    Schott, JR
    Palluconi, FD
    Heider, DL
    Hook, SJ
    Markham, BL
    Chander, G
    O'Donnell, EM
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 29 (02) : 141 - 153
  • [3] TOWARDS A LOCAL SPLIT WINDOW METHOD OVER LAND SURFACES
    BECKER, F
    LI, ZL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 11 (03) : 369 - 393
  • [4] MODTRAN cloud and multiple scattering upgrades with application to AVIRIS
    Berk, A
    Bernstein, LS
    Anderson, GP
    Acharya, PK
    Robertson, DC
    Chetwynd, JH
    Adler-Golden, SM
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 65 (03) : 367 - 375
  • [5] Choice of data scale: Predicting resolution error in a regional evapotranspiration model
    Bresnahan, PA
    Miller, DR
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1997, 84 (1-2) : 97 - 113
  • [6] Bugbee B, 1999, ADV SPACE RES, V22, P1425
  • [7] RELATIONS BETWEEN EVAPORATION COEFFICIENTS AND VEGETATION INDEXES STUDIED BY MODEL SIMULATIONS
    CHOUDHURY, BJ
    AHMED, NU
    IDSO, SB
    REGINATO, RJ
    DAUGHTRY, CST
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 50 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [8] A temperature and emissivity separation algorithm for Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) images
    Gillespie, A
    Rokugawa, S
    Matsunaga, T
    Cothern, JS
    Hook, S
    Kahle, AB
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 36 (04): : 1113 - 1126
  • [9] Gillespie A.R., 1985, The TlMSData User's Workshop, June 18-19, 1985, P29
  • [10] JACKSON TJ, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V92, P476, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RSE.RSE.2003.10.021