The phantom portion of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Computed Tomography (CT) accreditation program: Practical tips, artifact examples, and pitfalls to avoid

被引:118
作者
McCollough, CH [1 ]
Bruesewitz, MR
McNitt-Gray, MF
Bush, K
Ruckdeschel, T
Payne, JT
Brink, JA
Zeman, RK
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Amer Coll Radiol, Accreditat & Stand, Reston, VA USA
[4] Alliance Med Phys, Alpharetta, GA 30004 USA
[5] Abbott NW Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Minneapolis, MN 55407 USA
[6] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[7] George Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20037 USA
关键词
ACR accreditation; ACR CT phantom; CT image quality; CT radiation dosimetry; CTDI;
D O I
10.1118/1.1769632
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The ACR CT accreditation program, begun in 2002, requires the submission of approximately 20 images, several completed data sheets and printouts of three Excel worksheets. The procedure manual is very detailed, yet participants unfamiliar with the program or having minimal CT experience have needed to redo aspects of their submission, or in some cases do not receive accreditation, due to mistakes made by the physicist. This review of the phantom portion of the ACR CT accreditation program supplements the ACR provided instructions with additional photos of phantom setup, region-of-interest (ROI), and image placement on the film sheets, and examples of completed portions of actual (but anonymous) submissions. Common mistakes, as well as uncommon but interesting images, are shown and explanations are given as to what could have been done to avoid the problem. Additionally, a review of CT dose measurement techniques and calculations will enable the physicist to better assist sites where typical exam doses are above the ACR reference values. (C) 2004 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2423 / 2442
页数:20
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 1990, 31 AAPM
  • [2] American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 1993, 39 AAPM
  • [3] *EUR COMM, 2000, EUR GUID QUAL CRIT C
  • [4] TEST PATTERN FOR VIDEO DISPLAYS AND HARD-COPY CAMERAS
    GRAY, JE
    LISK, KG
    HADDICK, DH
    HARSHBARGER, JH
    OOSTERHOF, A
    SCHWENKER, R
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 154 (02) : 519 - 527
  • [5] International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC PUBL
  • [6] Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography
    McCollough, CH
    [J]. HERZ, 2003, 28 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [7] McNitt Gray MF, 2002, RADIOGRAPHICS, V22, P1541
  • [8] Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart
    Morin, RL
    Gerber, TC
    McCollough, CH
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (06) : 917 - 922
  • [9] Nagel HD, 2000, RAD EXPOSURE COMPUTE
  • [10] ROTHENBERG LN, 2000, RSNA CAT COURS DIAGN