Socioeconomic Influences on the Effects of a Genetic Testing Direct-to-Consumer Marketing Campaign

被引:12
作者
Bowen, D. J. [1 ]
Harris, J. [2 ]
Jorgensen, C. M. [3 ]
Myers, M. F. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Kuniyuki, A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[6] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
Direct-to-consumer marketing; Genetic tests; Mass media campaign; HEALTH-CARE; CANCER; IMPACT; BREAST;
D O I
10.1159/000231722
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests is beginning to appear in select markets, and little independent evaluation has been conducted on the effects of this marketing on consumer attitudes or behavior. The purpose of this paper is to identify the effects of socioeconomic status on women's reactions to such a campaign, including knowledge of the test, perceptions of personal risk, communications with others about the test, and interest in pursuing the test. The only United States provider of genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility (BRCA1/2 testing) conducted a pilot marketing campaign that targeted women aged 25-54 and their health care providers in 2 cities, Atlanta, Ga., and Denver, Colo. The design for the evaluation was a post campaign consumer survey, based on a cross-sectional stratified random sample of women in the 2 intervention sites and 2 comparison sites. The campaign had no differential impact by socioeconomic status. However, there was a consistent relationship between socioeconomic status and several outcome variables, including knowledge of the test, beliefs about the test, and desire to know about genetic risk. These data indicate that socioeconomic status may play a role in uptake of genetic services, regardless of response to a media campaign. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 142
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GAO0754
[2]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2004, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V53, P603
[3]   Direct-to-consumer advertising and its utility in health care decision making: A consumer perspective [J].
Deshpande, A ;
Menon, A ;
Perri, M ;
Zinkhan, G .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2004, 9 (06) :499-513
[4]   A history of drug advertising: The evolving roles of consumers and consumer protection [J].
Donohue, Julie .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2006, 84 (04) :659-699
[5]   A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs [J].
Donohue, Julie M. ;
Cevasco, Marisa ;
Rosenthal, Meredith B. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (07) :673-681
[6]   Direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals [J].
Gellad, Ziad F. ;
Lyles, Kenneth W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 120 (06) :475-480
[7]   Benefits and harms of direct to consumer advertising: a systematic review [J].
Gilbody, S ;
Wilson, P ;
Watt, I .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 14 (04) :246-250
[8]   Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests for cancer: Buyer beware [J].
Gray, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) :3191-3193
[9]   Reading between the lines: Direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing [J].
Hull, SC ;
Prasad, K .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2001, 31 (03) :33-35
[10]   A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions [J].
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. ;
Gwinn, Marta ;
Bradley, Linda A. ;
Oostra, Ben A. ;
van Duijn, Cornelia M. ;
Khoury, Muin J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2008, 82 (03) :593-599