Life-table analysis of primary and assisted success following endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of supplementary endovascular intervention in improving outcome

被引:43
作者
May, J [1 ]
White, GH [1 ]
Waugh, R [1 ]
Petrasek, P [1 ]
Chaufour, X [1 ]
Arulchelvam, M [1 ]
Stephen, MS [1 ]
Harris, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Surg, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
endovascular aortic aneurysm repair;
D O I
10.1053/ejvs.1999.1060
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: the aim of this study was to analyse the effect of supplementary endovascular intervention on the outcome of primary endoluminal repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: between May 1992 and December 1998, 266 patients underwent endoluminal repair of AAA. Minimum period of follow-up was 6 months. Those patients in whom the endoprosthesis could not be deployed were converted to open repair at the primary operation. Patients developing an early endoleak, within 31 days, were treated by a period of observation and secondary endovascular intervention in persistent cases. Patients developing a late endoleak were treated similarly, without a period of observation. Outcome was analysed by the life-table method. Primary success occurred when aneurysms with endoleaks became excluded from the circulation as a result of supplementary endovascular intervention. Results: endoluminal repair failed in 17 patients requiring conversion to open repair at the original operation Supplementary endovascular intervention was undertaken in 26 patients, with early endoleaks (n = 6) and late endoleaks (n = 20). Interventions involved deployment of secondary endoluminal grafts within the primary grafts (n = 22), and coil embolisation (n = 4). Successful exclusion of the aneurysm sac was achieved in 22 of 26 (85%) patients undergoing supplementary endovascular procedures, Conditional cumulative incidence od primary graft failure and secondary graft failure in the presence of all-cause mortality at 6 years was 47% and 25% respectively. Conclusions: supplementary endovascular intervention is an important adjunct to endoluminal AAA repair with the potential to improve outcome and avoid conversion to open repair. Successful supplementary endovascular intervention was achieved in 85% of patients in whom it was attempted. Life-table analysis showed these supplementary procedures to be durable in the long term.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 655
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   The incidence, natural history, and outcome of secondary intervention for persistent collateral flow in the excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Darling, RC ;
Ozsvath, R ;
Chang, BB ;
Kreienberg, PB ;
Paty, PSK ;
Lloyd, WE ;
Saleem, A ;
Shah, DM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (06) :968-973
[2]   Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Analysis of 303 patients by life table method [J].
May, J ;
White, GH ;
Yu, WY ;
Ly, CN ;
Waugh, R ;
Stephen, MS ;
Arulchelvam, M ;
Harris, JP .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) :213-220
[3]  
MAY J, IN PRESS J VASCULAR
[4]   Persistent collateral perfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair does not lead to progressive change in aneurysm diameter [J].
Resch, T ;
Ivancev, K ;
Lindh, M ;
Nyman, U ;
Brunkwall, J ;
Malina, M ;
Lindblad, B .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 28 (02) :242-249
[5]  
Umscheid T, 1999, J ENDOVASC SURG, V6, P17, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0017:TRAISP>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
White GH, 1997, J ENDOVASC SURG, V4, P152, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0152:EAACOE>2.0.CO
[8]  
2