Indirect effects of grassland extensification schemes on pollinators in two contrasting European countries

被引:37
作者
Kohler, Florian
Verhulst, Jort
Knop, Eua
Herzog, Felix
Kleijn, Dauid
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Lab Ecol Syst ECOS, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Nat Conservat & Plant Ecol Grp, NL-6708 PD Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Swiss Fed Res Stn Agroecol & Agr, Agroscope Reckenholz Tanikon Res Stn ART, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Aquat Ecol & Environm Biol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
agri-environment schemes; insect abundance; plant phenology; plant species cover; species richness;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.037
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Flower-visiting insects play a crucial role in ecosystem processes by providing essential services such as pollination. During the last decades, agricultural intensification has caused a widespread decline of insect diversity. Agri-environment schemes (AES) have been implemented in many European countries to counteract the loss of biodiversity. Here, we present results of a study evaluating effects of AES on pollinators and the insect-pollinated plants in grasslands of two contrasting European countries: Switzerland and The Netherlands. We compare species composition and abundance of bees and insect-pollinated plants in 37 field pairs, one with an AES, the other conventionally managed. AES significantly affected species-richness and abundance of non-Apis bees in Switzerland. Schemes did not have an effect in The Netherlands where bee species number and abundance was much lower than in Switzerland. The different effectiveness between countries can be explained by different contextual conditions and different effects of AES management prescriptions on the food resource of wild bees. We conclude that in order to stop the overall loss of agro-biodiversity, it can be recommended to include additional measures which focus specifically on the enhancement of bees or other arthropods. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 307
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
BANASZAK J, 1980, Polish Ecological Studies, V6, P355
[2]   Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? [J].
Benton, TG ;
Vickery, JA ;
Wilson, JD .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (04) :182-188
[3]   Declining plant species richness of grassland ditch banks - a problem of colonisation or extinction? [J].
Blomqvist, MM ;
Vos, P ;
Klinkhamer, PGL ;
ter Keurs, WJ .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 109 (03) :391-406
[4]  
BRESLOW NE, 1984, APPL STAT-J ROY ST C, V33, P38
[5]   The response of foraging bumblebees to successional change in newly created arable field margins [J].
Carvell, C ;
Meek, WR ;
Pywell, RF ;
Nowakowski, M .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 118 (03) :327-339
[6]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[7]   Causes of rarity in bumblebees [J].
Goulson, D ;
Hanley, ME ;
Darvill, B ;
Ellis, JS ;
Knight, ME .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 122 (01) :1-8
[8]   Assessing the intensity of temperate European agriculture at the landscape scale [J].
Herzog, F ;
Steiner, B ;
Bailey, D ;
Baudry, J ;
Billeter, R ;
Bukácek, R ;
De Blust, G ;
De Cock, R ;
Dirksen, J ;
Dormann, CF ;
De Filippi, R ;
Frossard, E ;
Liira, J ;
Schmidt, T ;
Stöckli, R ;
Thenail, C ;
van Wingerden, W ;
Bugter, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2006, 24 (02) :165-181
[9]   Endangered mutualisms: The conservation of plant-pollinator interactions [J].
Kearns, CA ;
Inouye, DW ;
Waser, NM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1998, 29 :83-112
[10]   How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? [J].
Kleijn, D ;
Sutherland, WJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) :947-969