The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test

被引:426
作者
Fitzgerald, JT [1 ]
Funnell, MM [1 ]
Hess, GE [1 ]
Barr, PA [1 ]
Anderson, RM [1 ]
Hiss, RG [1 ]
Davis, WK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Med Educ, Towsley Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.21.5.706
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To examine the reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. The diabetes knowledge test has two components: a 14-item general test and a 9-item insulin-use subscale. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - To populations completed the test. In one population, patients received diabetes care in their community from a variety of providers, while the other population received care from local health departments. Cronbach's coefficient cc was used to calculate scale reliability for each sample. To determine validity, patient group differences were examined. It was hypothesized that test scores would be higher for patients with type 1 diabetes, for patients with more education, and for patients who had received diabetes education. RESULTS - The coefficient alpha s for the general test and the insulin-use subscale indicate that both are reliable, alpha greater than or equal to 0.70. In the community sample, patients 1 vith type 1 diabetes scored higher than patients with type 2 diabetes on the general test and the insulin-use subscale. In the health department sample, patients with type 1 scored higher than patients with type 2 on the insulin-use subscale. For both samples, scores increased as the years of formal education completed increased, and patients who received diabetes education scored higher than patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS - Although the samples differed demographically, the reliability and validity of the test were supported in both the community and the health department samples. This suggests that the test is appropriate for a variety of settings and patient populations.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 710
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] KNOWLEDGE IMPROVEMENT AND METABOLIC CONTROL IN DIABETES EDUCATION - APPROACHING THE LIMITS
    BEENEY, LJ
    DUNN, SM
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1990, 16 (03) : 217 - 229
  • [2] RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF DIABETIC PATIENT EDUCATION - IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT IMPROVED METABOLIC STATUS
    BLOOMGARDEN, ZT
    KARMALLY, W
    METZGER, MJ
    BROTHERS, M
    NECHEMIAS, C
    BOOKMAN, J
    FAIERMAN, D
    GINSBERGFELLNER, F
    RAYFIELD, E
    BROWN, WV
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (03) : 263 - 272
  • [3] METAANALYSIS OF DIABETES PATIENT EDUCATION RESEARCH - VARIATIONS IN INTERVENTION EFFECTS ACROSS STUDIES
    BROWN, SA
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1992, 15 (06) : 409 - 419
  • [4] BROWN SA, 1988, NURS RES, V37, P223
  • [5] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [6] GRABER A, 1907, DIABETES, V26, P61
  • [7] THE VALIDATION OF A DIABETES PATIENT KNOWLEDGE TEST
    HESS, GE
    DAVIS, WK
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1983, 6 (06) : 591 - 596