Rapid extraction from and direct identification in clinical samples of methicillin-resistant staphylococci using the PCR

被引:72
作者
Jaffe, RI
Lane, JD
Albury, SV
Niemeyer, DM
机构
[1] David Grant Med Ctr, Travis AFB, CA 94535 USA
[2] USAF, Force Protect Battlelab, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.38.9.3407-3412.2000
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) are one of the most common causes of nosocomial infections and bacteremia. Standard bacterial identification and susceptibility testing frequently require as long as 72 h to report results, and there may be difficulty in rapidly and accurately identifying methicillin resistance. The use of the PCR is a rapid and simple process for the amplification of target DNA sequences, which can be used to identify and test bacteria for antimicrobial resistance. However, many sample preparation methods are unsuitable for PCR utilization in the clinical laboratory because they either are not cost-effective, take too long to perform, or do not provide a satisfactory DNA template for PCR. Our goal was to provide same-day results to facilitate rapid diagnosis and therapy. In this report, we describe a rapid method for extraction of bacterial DNA directly from blood culture bottles that gave quality DNA for PCR in as little as 20 min. We compared this extraction method to the standard QIAGEN method for turnaround time (TAT), cost, purity, and use of template in PCR Specific identification of MRS was determined using intragenic primer sets for bacterial and Staphylococcus 16S rRNA and mecA gene sequences. The PCR primer sets were validated with 416 isolates of staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 106), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (n = 134), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 176). The total supply cost of our extraction method and PCR was $2.15 per sample with a result TAT of less than 4 h. The methods described herein represent a rapid and accurate DNA extraction and PCR-based identification system, which makes the system an ideal candidate for use under austere field conditions and one that may have utility in the clinical laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:3407 / 3412
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Discrepancies between mecA PCR and conventional tests used for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Araj, GF ;
Talhouk, RS ;
Simaan, CJ ;
Maasad, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (01) :47-52
[2]   ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI [J].
ARCHER, GL ;
CLIMO, MW .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1994, 38 (10) :2231-2237
[3]  
Archer Gordon L., 1994, Trends in Microbiology, V2, P343, DOI 10.1016/0966-842X(94)90608-4
[4]   Rapid assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using multiplex PCR [J].
Barski, P ;
Piechowicz, L ;
Galinski, J ;
Kur, J .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 1996, 10 (06) :471-475
[5]   ADDITIONAL DNA IN METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS AND MOLECULAR-CLONING OF MEC-SPECIFIC DNA [J].
BECK, WD ;
BERGERBACHI, B ;
KAYSER, FH .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1986, 165 (02) :373-378
[6]  
BERGERBACHI B, 1989, MOL GEN GENET, V219, P263
[7]  
Carroll KC, 1996, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V106, P600
[9]   Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications [J].
Chambers, HF .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 10 (04) :781-+
[10]   OUTBREAK OF INFECTIONS CAUSED BY STRAINS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS RESISTANT TO METHICILLIN AND AMINOGLYCOSIDES .1. CLINICAL STUDIES [J].
CROSSLEY, K ;
LOESCH, D ;
LANDESMAN, B ;
MEAD, K ;
CHERN, M ;
STRATE, R .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1979, 139 (03) :273-279