Use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolismin patients with an intermediate probability ventilation/perfusion scan

被引:11
作者
Stone, E [1 ]
Roach, P
Bernard, E
Briggs, G
Havryk, A
Faulder, K
Dennis, C
机构
[1] Royal N Shore Hosp, Dept Resp Med, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[2] Royal N Shore Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[3] Royal N Shore Hosp, Dept Radiol, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Woolcock Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
pulmonary embolism (diagnosis); radionuclide imaging; tomography; x-ray computed;
D O I
10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00345.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Computed tomography pulmonary -angiography (CTPA) plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Although accurate in the detection of large PE, its accuracy in other patient groups is yet to be defined. Aim: To compare CTPA with pulmonary angiog-raphy as a second-line investigation in patients with a ventilation/perfusion (VQ) scan indicating an intermediate probability of PE. Methods: We recruited 25 patients over a 17-month period. Subjects were eligible if they: (i) had clinically suspected PE, (ii) had a VQ scan indicating an intermediate probability of PE and (iii) were referred for pulmonary angiography. Subjects underwent CTPA within 36 h of the VQ scan. CTPA was interpreted without knowledge of the results of the pulmonary angiogram by two of the authors. Results: PE was prevalent (i.e. embolus detected at pulmonary angiography) in seven of 25 subjects (28%). The sensitivity of CTPA was 57% and the specificity was 94%. Conclusions: In the setting of intermediate-probability VQ scanning, CTPA may be used to clarify the diagnosis of PE. However, a negative CTPA cannot -definitely exclude PE. Conventional pulmonary angiography may be necessary to determine the presence of PE if CTPA is negative.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 78
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1973, CIRCULATION, V47, P1, DOI DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.96.8.2498
[3]  
*BRIT THOR SOC NEB, 1997, THORAX S2, V52, pS4
[4]   Contrast-enhanced helical CT for pulmonary embolism detection:: Inter- and intraobserver agreement among radiologists with variable experience [J].
Chartrand-Lefebvre, CC ;
Howarth, N ;
Lucidarme, O ;
Beigelman, C ;
Cluzel, P ;
Mourey-Gérosa, I ;
Cadi, M ;
Grenier, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (01) :107-112
[5]   Acute pulmonary embolism: Assessment of helical CT for diagnosis [J].
Drucker, EA ;
Rivitz, SM ;
Shepard, JAO ;
Boiselle, PM ;
Trotman-Dickenson, B ;
Welch, TJ ;
Maus, TP ;
Miller, SW ;
Kaufman, JA ;
Waltman, AC ;
McLoud, TC ;
Athanasoulis, CA .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (01) :235-241
[6]   Fortnightly review - The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism [J].
Fennerty, T .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7078) :425-429
[7]   Improving detection of venous thromboembolism - New technology holds promise for early, precise diagnosis [J].
Gill, P ;
Nahum, A .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2000, 108 (04) :24-+
[8]   Subsequent pulmonary embolism: Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy [J].
Goodman, LR ;
Lipchik, RJ ;
Kuzo, RS ;
Liu, Y ;
McAuliffe, TL ;
O'Brien, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :535-542
[9]   DETECTION OF PULMONARY-EMBOLISM IN PATIENTS WITH UNRESOLVED CLINICAL AND SCINTIGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS - HELICAL CT VERSUS ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
GOODMAN, LR ;
CURTIN, JJ ;
MEWISSEN, MW ;
FOLEY, WD ;
LIPCHIK, RJ ;
CRAIN, MR ;
SAGAR, KB ;
COLLIER, BD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (06) :1369-1374
[10]   Pulmonary angiography performed with iopamidol: Complications in 1,434 patients [J].
Hudson, ER ;
Smith, TP ;
McDermott, VG ;
Newman, GE ;
Suhocki, PV ;
Payne, CS ;
Stackhouse, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (01) :61-65