Percutaneous endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: A feasibility study

被引:88
作者
Traul, DK [1 ]
Clair, DG [1 ]
Gray, B [1 ]
O'Hara, PJ [1 ]
Ouriel, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Vasc Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2000.107987
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endovascular grafting has markedly reduced the invasiveness of the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. By using a modification of technique for available closure devices, we have been able to achieve percutaneous repair of aneurysms. This study reviewed our initial experience with this technique. Methods: Demographics and background data from patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms were reviewed from prospectively collected registry data. Operative notes and angiogaphic and computed tomography scan data were retrospectively reviewed to assess the success of the percutaneous approach. Results: Fourteen patients have undergone percutaneous placement of the AneuRx (Medtronic, Sunnyvale, Calif) endovascular graft, with a modification of the technique for the Prostar (Perclose, Redwood City, Calif) device for access site closure. Main graft body introduction with a 22F sheath proved successful in nine of 12 (75%) deployments. Contralateral limb deployment through a 16F sheath was successful in 10 of 14 deployments (71.4%). Reasons for conversion to open groin incisions include inadequate percutaneous hemostasis (six cases), iliofemoral dissection (four cases), device failure (one case), and compromised distal flow (one case). Percutaneous deployment success appears to be improved with larger iliac artery dimensions, decreased calcification, and limited tortuosity, because of the Limitation of complications related to delivering a larger diameter sheath. Of the 13 percutaneous endograft insertions that were attempted, six (46.2%) were completely successful. Conclusion: Percutaneous deployment of available devices is technically feasible by using modifications of technique with percutaneous closure devices, despite large introducer sizes. Further experience with this technique offers the potential for identifying patients in whom this will prove successful and for even further reducing hospital stay and recovery times for aneurysm repair.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 776
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BAIM DS, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P442
[2]  
Diethrich EB, 1997, TEX HEART I J, V24, P179
[3]  
Gerckens U, 1998, HERZ, V23, P27, DOI 10.1007/BF03043009
[4]  
Haas PC, 1999, J ENDOVASC SURG, V6, P168, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0168:COLPAS>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Jordan WD, 1998, AM SURGEON, V64, P1070
[7]   Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Analysis of 303 patients by life table method [J].
May, J ;
White, GH ;
Yu, WY ;
Ly, CN ;
Waugh, R ;
Stephen, MS ;
Arulchelvam, M ;
Harris, JP .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) :213-220
[8]   Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with percutaneous transfemoral prostheses deployment under local anaesthesia. Initial experience with a new, simple-to-use tubular and bifurcated device in the first 27 cases [J].
Papazoglou, K ;
Christu, K ;
Iordanides, T ;
Balitas, A ;
Giakoystides, D ;
Giakoystides, E ;
Papazoglou, O .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 17 (03) :202-207
[9]   AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Multicenter prospective clinical trial [J].
Zarins, CK ;
White, RA ;
Schwarten, D ;
Kinney, E ;
Diethrich, EB ;
Hodgson, KJ ;
Fogarty, TJ .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 29 (02) :292-306