The edaphic quantitative protargol stain: a sampling protocol for assessing soil ciliate abundance and diversity

被引:17
作者
Acosta-Mercado, D [1 ]
Lynn, DH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Zool, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
microbial diversity; soil ciliates; sampling strategy; quantitative protocol;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00042-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It has been suggested that species loss from microbial groups low in diversity that occupy trophic positions close to the base of the detrital food web could be critical for terrestrial ecosystem functioning. Among the protozoans within the soil microbial loop, ciliates are presumably the least abundant and of low diversity. However, the lack of a standardized method to quantitatively enumerate and identify them has hampered our knowledge about the magnitude of their active and potential diversity, and about the interactions in which they are involved. Thus, the Edaphic Quantitative Protargol Staining (EQPS) method is provided to simultaneously account for ciliate species richness and abundance in a quantitative and qualitative way. This direct method allows this rapid and simultaneous assessment by merging the Non-flooded Petri Dish (NFPD) method [Prog. Protistol. 2 (1987) 69] and the Quantitative Protargol Stain (QPS) method [Montagnes, D.J.S., Lynn, D.H., 1993. A quantitative protargol stain (QPS) for ciliates and other protists. In: Kemp, P.F., Sherr, B.F., Sherr, E.B., Cole, JJ. (Eds.), Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 229-240]. The abovementioned protocols were refined by experiments examining the spatial distribution of ciliates under natural field conditions, sampling intensity, the effect of storage, and the use of cytological preparations versus live observations. The EQPS could be useful in ecological studies since it provides both a "snapshot" of the active and effective diversity and a robust estimate of the potential diversity. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A preliminary assessment of spatial patterns of soil ciliate diversity in two subtropical forests in Puerto Rico and its implications for designing an appropriate sampling approach [J].
Acosta-Mercado, D ;
Lynn, DH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 34 (10) :1517-1520
[2]   Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europaeus (Poaceae): Faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth [J].
Alphei, J ;
Bonkowski, M ;
Scheu, S .
OECOLOGIA, 1996, 106 (01) :111-126
[3]   ENUMERATION OF SOIL CILIATE ACTIVE FORMS AND CYSTS BY A DIRECT COUNT METHOD [J].
BAMFORTH, SS .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 34 (1-4) :209-212
[4]   COMPARISON BETWEEN DIRECT COUNTS OF ACTIVE SOIL CILIATES (PROTOZOA) AND MOST PROBABLE NUMBER ESTIMATES OBTAINED BY SINGH DILUTION CULTURE METHOD [J].
BERTHOLD, A ;
PALZENBERGER, M .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1995, 19 (04) :348-356
[5]   PROTOZOAN GRAZING OF BACTERIA IN SOIL - IMPACT AND IMPORTANCE [J].
CLARHOLM, M .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1981, 7 (04) :343-350
[6]   A STUDY OF REPRODUCTION AND OTHER LIFE-CYCLE PHENOMENA IN PLANKTONIC PROTISTS USING AN ACRIDINE-ORANGE FLUORESCENCE TECHNIQUE [J].
COATS, DW ;
HEINBOKEL, JF .
MARINE BIOLOGY, 1982, 67 (01) :71-79
[7]   A DIRECT COUNTING METHOD FOR SOIL CILIATES [J].
COUTEAUX, MM ;
PALKA, L .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 20 (01) :7-10
[8]   An improved counting method for motile protozoan cultures [J].
Erhan, S. ;
Franko, E. A. ;
Rutman, R. J. .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY, 1969, 90 :161-164
[9]  
Ewel J. J., 1973, ECOLOGICAL LIFE ZONE
[10]   Estimating the growth potential of the soil protozoan community [J].
Finlay, BJ ;
Black, HIJ ;
Brown, S ;
Clarke, KJ ;
Esteban, GF ;
Hindle, RM ;
Olmo, JL ;
Rollett, A ;
Vickerman, K .
PROTIST, 2000, 151 (01) :69-80