Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Comparison of Two Widely Used Prognostic Calculators

被引:24
作者
Bardia, Aditya [3 ]
Loprinzi, Charles [1 ]
Grothey, Axel [1 ]
Nelson, Garth [2 ]
Alberts, Steven [1 ]
Menon, Smitha [1 ]
Thome, Stephan [4 ]
Gill, Sharlene [5 ]
Sargent, Dan [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Creighton Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER; THERAPY; FLUOROURACIL; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.12.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Two Web-based prognostic calculators (Adjuvant! and Numeracy) are widely used to individualize decisions regarding adjuvant therapy among patients with resected stage II and III colon cancer. However, these tools have not been directly compared. Hypothetical scenarios were formulated for the Numeracy calculator based on all potential combinations of age, lymph nodes status, tumor stage, and grade of tumor. These were then applied to three postsurgical therapy choices: observation, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin chemotherapy) to obtain the predicted 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the numerical predictions between the Adjuvant! and Numeracy calculators for each combination. A total of 192 hypothetical patient scenarios were obtained. For these patients, DFS and OS predictions from Adjuvant! were statistically significantly different than Numeracy (P <.05), except for four of 144 categories. While the estimated benefit in DFS and OS for 5-FU compared to surgery obtained from Adjuvant! and Numeracy were similar, the benefit in DFS and OS for FOLFOX over 5-FU, obtained from the Adjuvant! tool was slightly lower than that estimated from Numeracy. Among patients with resected stage II and III colon cancer, the DFS and OS estimates obtained from Numeracy and Adjuvant!, regarding the benefit of 5-FU over surgery, are similar, but the benefits of FOLFOX over 5-FU differ. Validation studies are needed to clarify the discrepancy and to assess the accuracy of these tools for predicting actual patient outcomes. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer
    Andre, T
    Boni, C
    Mounedji-Boudiaf, L
    Navarro, M
    Tabernero, J
    Hickish, T
    Topham, C
    Zaninelli, M
    Clingan, P
    Bridgewater, J
    Tabah-Fisch, I
    de Gramont, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (23) : 2343 - 2351
  • [2] Adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colorectal cancer
    de Gramont, Aimery
    Tournigand, Christophe
    Andre, Thierry
    Larsen, Annette K.
    Louvet, Christophe
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2007, 34 (02) : S37 - S40
  • [3] THE ROGERS,WILL PHENOMENON - STAGE MIGRATION AND NEW DIAGNOSTIC-TECHNIQUES AS A SOURCE OF MISLEADING STATISTICS FOR SURVIVAL IN CANCER
    FEINSTEIN, AR
    SOSIN, DM
    WELLS, CK
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (25) : 1604 - 1608
  • [4] Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer
    Figueredo, Alvaro
    Coombes, Megan E.
    Mukherjee, Som
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (03):
  • [5] Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer:: Who benefits and by how much?
    Gill, S
    Loprinzi, CL
    Sargent, DJ
    Thomé, SD
    Alberts, SR
    Haller, DG
    Benedetti, J
    Francini, G
    Shepherd, LE
    Seitz, JF
    Labianca, R
    Chen, W
    Cha, SS
    Heldebrant, MP
    Goldberg, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (10) : 1797 - 1806
  • [6] Cancer statistics, 2008
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ward, Elizabeth
    Hao, Yongping
    Xu, Jiaquan
    Murray, Taylor
    Thun, Michael J.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2008, 58 (02) : 71 - 96
  • [7] Loprinzi Charles L, 2003, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V1, P189
  • [8] Understanding the utility of adjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer
    Loprinzi, CL
    Thomé, SD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) : 972 - 979
  • [9] DO AMERICAN ONCOLOGISTS KNOW-HOW TO USE PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY-DIAGNOSED PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER
    LOPRINZI, CL
    RAVDIN, PM
    DELAURENTIS, M
    NOVOTNY, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (07) : 1422 - 1426
  • [10] Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer
    Olivotto, IA
    Bajdik, CD
    Ravdin, PM
    Speers, CH
    Coldman, AJ
    Norris, BD
    Davis, GJ
    Chia, SK
    Gelmon, KA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (12) : 2716 - 2725