Patient and physician satisfaction with the Humulin®/Humalog® Pen, a new 3.0-mL prefilled pen device for insulin delivery

被引:46
作者
Bohannon, NJV [1 ]
Ohannesian, JP [1 ]
Burdan, AL [1 ]
Holcombe, JH [1 ]
Zagar, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
insulin pen device; diabetes; patient acceptance; questionnaire;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80084-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: This study assessed acceptability of a new 3.0-mL prefilled insulin pen device, the Humulin(R)/Humalog(R) Pen, as a method of delivering human insulin. Secondary objectives were to determine whether the pen device might facilitate initiation of insulin therapy in patients currently receiving oral antihyperglycemic agents and to monitor the safety of this pen device in clinical practice. Background: For both the patient and health care provider, significant negative perceptions of the use of insulin therapy persist, including patient inconvenience, social stigma from insulin injections, and insufficient time for the provider to train the patient. Methods: This 6-week, open-label, noncomparative study was conducted at 33 centers in the United States. Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes treated with insulin therapy or oral antihyperglycemic agents were enrolled in the study. Before the study, 62% (194 patients) had used a syringe and vial for insulin injection, 28% (87 patients) had used an insulin pen device, and 10% (30 patients) were insulin-naive. Prior therapy was unknown in 1% (4 patients). Patients used the Humulin/Humalog Pen for greater than or equal to 1 injection of insulin daily for 6 weeks. At the beginning and end of the study, patients completed a questionnaire designed to elicit their perceptions of the Humulin/Humalog Pen; physicians completed a questionnaire at the end of the study. Frequencies and percentages of all categoric responses were calculated and summarized. Results: A total of 315 patients (136 type 1, 179 type 2 diabetes) were enrolled. Of the 299 patients who completed questionnaires at the end of the study, 76% (226 patients) were somewhat or extremely satisfied with the pen, 78% (234 patients) probably or definitely would continue to use the pen, and 80% (239 patients) probably or definitely would recommend the pen to others. Of the 33 physicians who completed questionnaires at the end of the study, 97% (32) thought that the pen was better overall compared with a vial and syringe, 88% (29) thought that it took less time to teach patients to use the pen, and 73% (24) thought that it took less time to initiate insulin therapy with the pen. Conclusions: The Humulin/Humalog Pen had an acceptable safety profile and was well accepted by patients and physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1067
页数:19
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Pen injection and change in metabolic control and quality of life in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
    Andersson, PO
    Wikby, A
    Stenstrom, U
    Hornquist, JO
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1997, 36 (03) : 169 - 172
  • [2] BENNETT PH, 1991, TXB DIABETES, V1, P39
  • [3] Corsi A, 1997, DIABETES NUTR METAB, V10, P78
  • [4] SAFETY, EFFICACY, ACCEPTABILITY OF A PRE-FILLED INSULIN PEN IN DIABETIC-PATIENTS OVER 60 YEARS OLD
    COSCELLI, C
    LOSTIA, S
    LUNETTA, M
    NOSARI, I
    CORONEL, GA
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1995, 28 (03) : 173 - 177
  • [5] Assessment by patients with diabetes mellitus of two insulin pen delivery systems versus a vial and syringe
    Graff, MR
    McClanahan, MA
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 20 (03) : 486 - 496
  • [6] INSULIN-PEN TREATMENT, QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND METABOLIC CONTROL - RETROSPECTIVE INTRAGROUP EVALUATIONS
    HORNQUIST, JO
    WIKBY, A
    ANDERSSON, PO
    DUFVA, AM
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1990, 10 (03) : 221 - 230
  • [7] CHANGE IN QUALITY-OF-LIFE ALONG WITH TYPE-1 DIABETES
    HORNQUIST, JO
    WIKBY, A
    STENSTROM, U
    ANDERSSON, PO
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1995, 28 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [8] Comparison of NovoPen 3 and syringes/vials in the acceptance of insulin therapy in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to oral hypoglycaemic agents
    Kadiri, A
    Chraibi, A
    Marouan, F
    Ababou, MR
    El Guermai, N
    Wadjinny, A
    Kerfati, A
    Douiri, M
    Bensouda, JD
    Belkhadir, J
    Arvanitis, Y
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1998, 41 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [9] Biologic material in needles and cartridges after insulin injection with a pen in diabetic patients
    Le Floch, JP
    Herbreteau, C
    Lange, F
    Perlemuter, L
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (09) : 1502 - 1504
  • [10] PLEVIN S, 1993, CLIN THER, V15, P423