Efficacy and acceptability of nedocromil sodium 2% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% in perennial allergic conjunctivitis

被引:11
作者
Alexander, M
Allegro, S
Hicks, A
机构
[1] Niagara Falls, Ont. L2E 7H1
关键词
allergic conjunctivitis; nedocromil; olopatadine; cost-effectiveness;
D O I
10.1007/BF02853155
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In this 2-week, randomized, crossover study, ophthalmic solutions of nedocromil sodium 2% and olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% were compared for effectiveness and acceptability in 28 patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis and previous olopatadine experience. Patients received nedocromil twice daily or olopatadine twice daily for 1 week, then were crossed over to the alternate medication for 1 week. Outcome measures were patient satisfaction (questionnaire), severity of ocular symptoms (daily diary scores), clinical signs (physician assessments), quality of life (questionnaire), and global assessments of effectiveness. Both medications were well accepted. Of the 28 patients, 16 (57.1%) would request a nedocromil prescription, 10 (35.7%) an olopatadine prescription (P = .157); 22 patients (78.6%) would recommend nedocromil to other allergy sufferers, while 18 (64.3%) would recommend olopatadine (P = .480). Light sensitivity scores were significantly lower with nedocromil (P = .0125); other symptom scores were comparable between medications. Both drugs significantly (P<.01) and comparably decreased erythema, conjunctival injection, and overall conjunctival signs from baseline. Comparable improvement also occurred in quality-of-life scores. Both physicians and patients judged nedocromil and olopatadine to be similarly effective in preventing signs and symptoms. Nedocromil sodium 2% is an effective treatment for perennial allergic conjunctivitis. Patients receiving olopatadine can be switched to nedocromil with no loss in efficacy or satisfaction, but with a reduction in cost.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 147
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Comparison of topical nedocromil sodium and oral terfenadine for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
    Alexander, M
    Rosen, LJ
    Yang, WH
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 21 (11) : 1900 - 1907
  • [2] COMPARATIVE THERAPEUTIC STUDIES WITH TILAVIST
    ALEXANDER, M
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1995, 50 (21) : 23 - 29
  • [3] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NEDOCROMIL SODIUM OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION IN THE TREATMENT OF SEASONAL ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS
    BLUMENTHAL, M
    CASALE, T
    DOCKHORN, R
    JARMOSZUK, I
    KAISER, H
    SMITH, R
    ZEITZ, HJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 113 (01) : 56 - 63
  • [4] Management of allergic conjunctivitis
    Ciprandi, G
    Buscaglia, S
    Canonica, GW
    [J]. CLINICAL IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 1996, 5 (05): : 374 - 391
  • [5] Nedocromil sodium: a review of the evidence for a dual mechanism of action
    Corin, RE
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2000, 30 (04) : 461 - 468
  • [6] Validation of the standardized version of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Juniper, EF
    Thompson, AK
    Ferrie, PJ
    Roberts, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 104 (02) : 364 - 369
  • [7] CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH TILAVIST - AN OVERVIEW OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY
    KJELLMAN, NIM
    STEVENS, MT
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1995, 50 (21) : 14 - 22
  • [8] Kremer B, 1998, ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCH, V48, P924
  • [9] LEINO M, 1990, ANN ALLERGY, V64, P398
  • [10] MELAMED J, IN PRESS ALLERGY AST