Evaluation of the precision of drop-size determination in oil/water emulsions by low-resolution NMR spectroscopy

被引:71
作者
Denkova, PS
Tcholakova, S
Denkov, ND
Danov, KD
Campbell, B
Shawl, C
Kim, D
机构
[1] Univ Sofia, Fac Chem, Lab Chem Phys & Engn, Sofia 1164, Bulgaria
[2] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Organ Chem, Lab NMR Spect, BU-1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
[3] Kraft Gen Foods Inc, Glenview, IL 60025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la048649v
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 [化学];
摘要
The accuracy of the recently reported low-resolution NMR method (Goudappel, G. J. W.; et al. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 239, 535) for the determination of drop-size distribution in oil-in-water emulsions is evaluated by comparing the NMR results with precise data from video-enhanced optical microscopy. A series of 27 soybean-oil-in-water emulsions, differing in their mean drop size, polydispersity, oil volume fraction, and emulsifier, is studied. Soybean oil is selected as a typical component of food emulsions. The experimental error of our optical procedure for drop-size determination is estimated to be around 0.3 mum, which allows us to use the microscopy data as a reference for the mean drop-size and distribution width of the studied emulsions, with known experimental error. The main acquisition parameters in the NMR experiment are varied to find their optimal values and to check how the experimental conditions affect the NMR results. Comparison of the results obtained by the two methods shows that the low-resolution NMR method underestimates the mean drop size, d(33), by approximate to20%. For most of the samples, NMR measures relatively precisely the distribution width (+/-0.1 to 0.2 dimensionless units), but for similar to20% of the samples, larger systematic deviation was registered (underestimate by 0.3-0.4 units). No correlation is found between the emulsion properties and the relative difference between the microscopy and NMR data. Possible reasons for the observed discrepancy between NMR and optical microscopy are discussed, and some advantages and limitations of the low-resolution NMR method are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:11402 / 11413
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
Allen T., 1975, PARTICLE SIZE MEASUR
[2]
DETERMINATION OF WATER DROPLET SIZE IN MARGARINES AND LOW-CALORIE SPREADS BY NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SELF-DIFFUSION [J].
BALINOV, B ;
SODERMAN, O ;
WARNHEIM, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1994, 71 (05) :513-518
[3]
Balinov B., 2001, ENCY HDB EMULSION TE, P279
[4]
Becher P., 1996, ENCY EMULSION TECHNO, V4
[5]
Callaghan P.T., 1991, Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy, V1st
[6]
Capillary mechanisms in membrane emulsification: oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by Tween 20 and milk proteins [J].
Christov, NC ;
Ganchev, DN ;
Vassileva, ND ;
Denkov, ND ;
Danov, KD ;
Kralchevsky, PA .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2002, 209 (01) :83-104
[7]
Spin echo analysis of restricted diffusion under generalized gradient waveforms: Planar, cylindrical, and spherical pores with wall relaxivity [J].
Codd, SL ;
Callaghan, PT .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1999, 137 (02) :358-372
[8]
COUPLAND JN, 2001, ENCY HDB EMULSION TE, pCH10
[9]
MECHANISM OF FORMATION OF 2-DIMENSIONAL CRYSTALS FROM LATEX-PARTICLES ON SUBSTRATES [J].
DENKOV, ND ;
VELEV, OD ;
KRALCHEVSKY, PA ;
IVANOV, IB ;
YOSHIMURA, H ;
NAGAYAMA, K .
LANGMUIR, 1992, 8 (12) :3183-3190
[10]
DUKHIN AS, 2002, ULTRASOUND CHARACTER, pCH8