Behavioural isolation between two closely related Hawaiian Drosophila species:: the role of courtship

被引:21
作者
Boake, CRB [1 ]
Andreadis, DK [1 ]
Witzel, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.2000.1509
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Behavioural isolation plays a critical role in several recent models of speciation. A detailed understanding of the process of speciation requires analysis of taxonomic groups that have not completed reproductive isolation. We studied D. silvestris and D. heteroneura because they are still in the process of divergence: behavioural isolation between them is incomplete, and neither postzygotic nor ecological isolation has been detected. Behavioural isolation is due to the failure of courtships between male D. silvestris and female D. heteroneura: there is no postzygotic isolation from either parental species. The Fl hybrids are as successful in courtship with parental individuals as same-species pairs, which suggests that the hybrids resemble male D. heteroneura or female D. silvestris in some behaviour patterns that are crucial to mating success. We searched for this crucial resemblance by examining courtship between F1 hybrids and the parental adults. We found that successful F1 males are somewhat more similar than unsuccessful F1 males to D. heteroneura males, but nevertheless they were intermediate between males of the two species. We also found that in both species the presence of female wings is necessary for courtship to proceed to copulation. These results reinforce an earlier report that behavioural isolation between these species is largely attributable to the decision as to whether to court at all, rather than to the details of courtship. (C) 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 501
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
AHEARN JN, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P347, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04232.x
[2]   Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods [J].
Aickin, M ;
Gensler, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (05) :726-728
[3]  
Andersson Malte, 1994
[4]  
ARNOLD SJ, 1993, HERPETOLOGICA, V49, P216
[5]   Inheritance of behavioural differences between two interfertile, sympatric species, Drosophila silvestris and D. heteroneura [J].
Boake C.R.B. ;
Price D.K. ;
Andreadis D.K. .
Heredity, 1998, 80 (5) :642-650
[6]  
Boake CRB, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1487, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02030.x
[7]   COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR AND MATING SUCCESS OF WILD-CAUGHT DROSOPHILA-SILVESTRIS MALES [J].
BOAKE, CRB ;
HOIKKALA, A .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 49 (05) :1303-1313
[8]   Correlates versus predictors of courtship success: courtship song in Drosophila silvestris and D-heteroneura [J].
Boake, CRB ;
Poulsen, T .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1997, 54 :699-704
[9]   Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura [J].
Boake, CRB ;
DeAngelis, MP ;
Andreadis, DK .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (23) :12442-12445
[10]  
Bradbury Jack W., 1998, pi