Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?

被引:119
作者
DeWilde, S
Carey, IM
Bremner, SA
Richards, N
Hilton, SR
Cook, DG
机构
[1] St George Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] St George Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] CompuFile Ltd, Woking, Surrey, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/heart.89.4.417
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To study trends in the use of lipid lowering drugs in the UK, and to assess which patient factors influence prescribing. Methods: Routinely collected computerised medical data were analysed from 142 general practices across England and Wales that provide data for the Doctors' Independent Network database. Subjects included were people aged 35 years or more with treated ischaemic heart disease, averaging annually over 30 000. The temporal trend from 1994 to 2001 in prescription of lipid lowering drugs and daily statin dose and the odds ratios (ORs) for receiving a statin prescription in 1998 were examined. Results: Lipid lowering drug prescribing increased greatly over time, entirely because of statins, so that in 2001 56.3% of men and 41.1% of women with ischaemic heart disease received lipid lowering drugs. However, 33% of these patients were on a < 20 mg simvastatin daily equivalent. In 1998 the OR for receiving a statin fell from 1 at age 55-64 to 0.64 at 65-74 and 0.16 at 75-84 years. The age effect was similar in those without major comorbidity. Revascularised patients were much more to receive a statin than those with angina (OR 3.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.57 to 4.31). Men were more likely to receive a statin than women (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.71) but this difference disappeared after adjustment for age and severity of disease (OR 1.06). Geographical region had little effect but there was a very weak socioeconomic gradient. Conclusions: Although prescribing has increased, many patients who may benefit from lipid lowering drugs either do not receive it or are undertreated, possibly because of lack of awareness of the relative potency of the different statins. Patients with angina and the elderly are less likely to receive treatment that may prevent a coronary event.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 421
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[2]   Secondary prevention in 24,431 patients with coronary heart disease: survey in primary care [J].
Brady, AJB ;
Oliver, MA ;
Pittard, JB .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7300) :1463-1463
[3]  
Collins R, 2002, LANCET, V360, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
[4]  
Department of Health, 2000, NAT SERV FRAM COR HE
[5]  
DeWilde S, 2001, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V51, P226
[6]  
Elley K M, 1993, Community Dent Health, V10, P131
[7]   Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study [J].
Freeman, AC ;
Sweeney, K .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7321) :1100-1102A
[8]  
Hammersley V, 2002, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V52, P463
[9]   Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey [J].
Hippisley-Cox, J ;
Pringle, M ;
Crown, N ;
Meal, A ;
Wynn, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7290) :832-834A
[10]   ACCESS TO CORONARY CATHETERIZATION - FAIR SHARES FOR ALL [J].
KEE, F ;
GAFFNEY, B ;
CURRIE, S ;
OREILLY, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6915) :1305-1307