A comparison of selective spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and general anesthesia with desflurane for outpatient knee arthroscopy

被引:44
作者
Korhonen, AM
Valanne, JV
Jokela, RM
Ravaska, P
Korttila, KT
机构
[1] Lapland Cent Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Rovaniemi, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000139351.40608.05
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In this randomized and controlled trial, 64 adult ambulatory knee arthroscopy patients received either selective spinal anesthesia (SSA) with 4 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine or general anesthesia (GA) with desflurane. We conducted the study to determine whether SSA with small-dose bupivacaine provides equal fast-tracking possibilities, a shorter stay in the postanesthesia care unit, and earlier discharge home compared with GA with desflurane. Patients with a high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting received prophylaxis in the GA group. No difference was seen in the fast-tracking possibilities or time in the postanesthesia care unit between the groups. Home readiness was achieved after 114 (31-174) and 129 (28-245) min (NS) in the SSA and GA groups, respectively. In the hospital, the pain scores were significantly (P < 0.001) lower in the SSA group compared with the GA group and the need for postoperative opioids was significantly (P = 0.008) larger after GA. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 0% versus 19% in the SSA and GA groups (P = 0.024), respectively. We conclude that for outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy, SSA with hyperbaric bupivacaine provides equal recovery times with less frequent side effects compared with GA with desflurane.
引用
收藏
页码:1668 / 1673
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting -: Conclusions from cross-validations between two centers [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Läärä, E ;
Koivuranta, M ;
Greim, CA ;
Roewer, N .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) :693-700
[2]   Spinal block or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for gynaecological outpatient procedures [J].
Danelli, G ;
Berti, M ;
Casati, A ;
Albertin, A ;
Deni, F ;
Nobili, F ;
Torri, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (08) :594-599
[3]   Droperidol: Should the black box be light gray? [J].
Dershwitz, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2002, 14 (08) :598-603
[4]   Inhalation anaesthesia is cost-effective for ambulatory surgery: a clinical comparison with propofol during elective knee arthroscopy [J].
Dolk, A ;
Cannerfelt, R ;
Anderson, RE ;
Jakobsson, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (02) :88-92
[5]   Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy [J].
Fanelli, G ;
Borghi, B ;
Casati, A ;
Bertini, L ;
Montebugnoli, M ;
Torri, G .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (08) :746-751
[6]   A comparison of psoas compartment block and spinal and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy [J].
Jankowski, CJ ;
Hebl, JR ;
Stuart, MJ ;
Rock, MG ;
Pagnano, MW ;
Beighley, CM ;
Schroeder, DR ;
Horlocker, TT .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (04) :1003-1009
[7]   No pain, no gain: clinical excellence and scientific rigour - lessons learned from IA morphine [J].
Kalso, E ;
Smith, L ;
McQuay, HJ ;
Moore, RA .
PAIN, 2002, 98 (03) :269-275
[8]   Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 3 mg plus fentanyl 10 μg for outpatient knee arthroscopy with tourniquet [J].
Korhonen, AM ;
Valanne, JV ;
Jokela, RM ;
Ravaska, P ;
Korttila, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (03) :342-346
[9]   Ondansetron does not prevent pruritus induced by low-dose intrathecal fentanyl [J].
Korhonen, AM ;
Valanne, JV ;
Jokela, RM ;
Ravaska, P ;
Korttila, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (10) :1292-1297
[10]  
Lennox PH, 2002, ANESTH ANALG, V94, P346