Robotic radical prostatectomy: A technique to reduce pT2 positive margins

被引:116
作者
Ahlering, TE [1 ]
Eichel, L [1 ]
Edwards, RA [1 ]
Lee, DI [1 ]
Skarecky, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To describe a technique using the da Vinci robotic system that enhances one's ability to visualize and dissect the apex and reduce surgical margins. An important outcome of radical prostatectomy is the reduction of iatrogenic positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer. Technical Considerations. The clinical data of our first 140 consecutive robot-assisted radical prostatectomies were divided into two groups: group 1, cases I to 50; and group 2, cases 51 to 140. After reviewing the surgical margin data and appropriate video clips of our initial 50 patients, we altered our technique. Initially, we had used two sutures to control the dorsal venous complex (DVC), one proximally and distally. The prostate was freed, and, finally, the DVC and urethra were divided. However, a bundle of fat obscured the apex, leading to positive apical margins. We developed the following method. First, we removed all of the fat overlying the DVC and prostate. Second, we divided the puboprostatic ligaments and dissected the levator fibers to expose and increase the DVC length fully. Finally, we stapled and divided the DVC using a vascular stapler. Results. The two groups were clinically comparable. Overall, the pathologic margin rate improved from 36% in group 1 to 16.7% in group 2. In group 1, 9 (27.3%) of 33 pT2 tumors had positive margins versus 3 (4.7%) of 64 pT2 tumors in group 2 (P = 0.003). Conclusions. The data demonstrate that this change in technique for robotic prostatectomy resulted in a more defined apical dissection and a statistically significant reduction in positive margins in patients with organ-confined disease. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1224 / 1228
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy
    Blute, ML
    Bostwick, DG
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Slezak, JM
    Martin, SK
    Amling, CL
    Zincke, H
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) : 733 - 739
  • [2] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases
    Bollens, R
    Vanden Bossche, M
    Roumeguere, T
    Damoun, A
    Ekane, S
    Hoffmann, P
    Zlotta, AR
    Schulman, CC
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [3] CAGIANNOS I, 2003, J UROL S, V165, P64
  • [4] Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer
    Eichelberger, LE
    Koch, MO
    Daggy, JK
    Ulbright, TM
    Eble, JN
    Cheng, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 120 (03) : 386 - 391
  • [5] Gorbonos A, 2003, J UROLOGY, V169, P457
  • [6] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute
    Guillonneau, B
    El-Fettouh, H
    Baumert, H
    Cathelineau, X
    Doublet, JD
    Fromont, G
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) : 1261 - 1266
  • [7] Han M, 2003, J UROLOGY, V169, P448
  • [8] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - The Creteil experience
    Hoznek, A
    Salomon, L
    Olsson, LE
    Antiphon, P
    Saint, F
    Cicco, A
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [9] Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation
    Katz, R
    Salomon, L
    Hoznek, A
    de la Taille, A
    Antiphon, P
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) : 2049 - 2052
  • [10] Lattouf JB, 2003, J UROLOGY, V169, P447