Response and nonresponse bias in oral health surveys

被引:82
作者
Locker, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Community Dent Hlth Serv Res Unit, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
关键词
bias; error; imputation; nonresponse; oral health; response rate; survey; weighting;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-7325.2000.tb03298.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Oral health surveys are undertaken to provide estimates of the dental health and behaviors of populations or population subgroups. However, the integrity of the data from sample surveys may be compromised by one or more sources of sampling and nonsampling error. An important source of nonsampling error is the failure to collect data from some of the individuals comprising the sample. Consequently, the response to a sample survey, and the direction and magnitude of bias induced by nonresponse, need to be taken into account when using estimates derived from sample surveys. Although the response rate to a survey is usually used as an indicator of the quality of the data it provides, nonresponse error is a function of nonresponse and the extent of differences in the characteristics of responders and nonresponders. Nonresponse may be managed in two ways. The first is to reduce nonresponse to a minimum using response-enhancement strategies. The second is the post-survey adjustment of data using weighting or imputation techniques to produce estimates that correct for nonresponse. This paper discusses issues concerning response and nonresponse bias in oral health surveys and provides guidelines on the management and reporting of nonresponse. It describes response-enhancement strategies to reduce noncontacts and refusals, sources of data to facilitate the comparison of responders and nonresponders, methods of assessing the degree of bias induced by nonresponse, techniques for producing adjusted survey estimates and the assumptions on which these procedures and processes are based.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 81
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Aday L.A., 1996, DESIGNING CONDUCTING, V2nd
  • [2] ALLISON KR, 1989, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V80, P67
  • [3] Andersen, 1979, TOTAL SURVEY ERROR
  • [4] Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals
    Asch, DA
    Jedrziewski, MK
    Christakis, NA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) : 1129 - 1136
  • [5] BANKS MJ, 1979, TOTAL SURVEY ERROR
  • [6] A RESPONSE TO THE NONRESPONSE PROBLEM
    BRADBURN, NM
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1992, 56 (03) : 391 - 397
  • [7] ADJUSTMENT OF REPORTED PREVALENCE OF RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS FOR NONRESPONSE IN A MULTICENTER HEALTH SURVEY
    CHINN, S
    ZANOLIN, E
    LAI, E
    JARVIS, D
    LUCZYNSKA, CM
    BURNEY, PGJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (03) : 603 - 611
  • [8] ASSESSING RESPONSE BIAS IN RANDOM-DIGIT DIALING SURVEYS - THE TELEPHONE-PREFIX METHOD
    DIEHR, P
    KOEPSELL, TD
    CHEADLE, A
    PSATY, BM
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (08) : 1009 - 1021
  • [9] Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
  • [10] THE DESIGN AND ADMINISTRATION OF MAIL SURVEYS
    DILLMAN, DA
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1991, 17 : 225 - 249