Public opinion on alcohol policies in the United States: Results from a national survey

被引:61
作者
Wagenaar, AC
Harwood, EM
Toomey, TL
Denk, CE
Zander, KM
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
[2] Hlth Partners Res Fdn, Minneapolis, MN 55440 USA
[3] Mathematica Policy Res Inc, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3343329
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We surveyed the U.S. non-institutionalized population age 18+ on opinions regarding 23 alcohol control policies (N = 7,021). The cooperation rate among contacted households was 70% and the overall response rate was 54%. Results showed high levels of public support for most alcohol control policies. Over 80% support restrictions on alcohol use in public places, such as parks, beaches, concert venues, and on college campuses. Eighty-two percent support increased alcohol taxes, provided the funds are used for treatment or prevention programs. Over 60% support alcohol advertising and promotion restrictions, such as banning billboard advertising, banning promotion at sporting events, or banning liquor and beer advertising on television.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 327
页数:25
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NATL I ALCOHOL ABUSE
[2]  
Baker S.B., 1992, The injury fact book
[3]  
CHALLIS M, 1993, COMPETENCE ASSESSMEN, V22, P6
[4]   EFFECTS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PRICES AND LEGAL DRINKING AGES ON YOUTH ALCOHOL-USE [J].
COATE, D ;
GROSSMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1988, 31 (01) :145-171
[5]  
Coate D., 1987, Alcohol Health and Research World, V12, P22
[6]  
COOK P, 1981, ALCOHOL PUBLIC POLIC
[7]  
Cook P., 1993, Alcohol Health Research World, V17, P151
[8]   THE EFFECT OF LIQUOR TAXES ON HEAVY DRINKING [J].
COOK, PJ ;
TAUCHEN, G .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1982, 13 (02) :379-390
[9]   SELF-INTEREST AND ATTITUDES ABOUT LEGISLATION CONTROLLING ALCOHOL [J].
CROWE, JW ;
BAILEY, WJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 76 (03) :995-1003
[10]   Advertising in demand systems for alcoholic drinks and tobacco: A comparative study [J].
Duffy, M .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 1995, 17 (06) :557-577