Ultrasound morphology of invasive lobular breast cancer is different compared with other types of breast cancer

被引:42
作者
Watermann, DO
Tempfer, C
Hefler, LA
Parat, C
Stickeler, E
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Vienna, Austria
关键词
invasive lobular cancer; breast neoplasms; ultrasound; image analysis; size measurement; ultrasound criteria;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.11.005
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 [声学]; 082403 [水声工程];
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ultrasound (US) morphology of invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC) in comparison to that of invasive tumors of other histologic differentiation (TOD). Images of 406 breast lesions were included in this retrospective study. A total of 10 US criteria (shape, orientation, echogenicity, echo pattern, calcifications, margin, margin contour, lesion boundary, surrounding tissue and posterior acoustic features) were defined and determined. Tumors were stratified into ILC (n = 69) vs. TOD (it = 337). The correlation between the sonographically and pathologically measured size of the tumors was analyzed. Irregular shape was found in 88% of ILC vs. 67% of TOD (p < 0.001). Margins were indistinct in 94% of ILC compared to 76% of TOD (p = 0.001). Posterior shadowing was observed in 84% of ILC and 58% of TOD (p = 0.001). Irregular margin contour, hyper- or isoechoic pattern and architectural distortion were more frequent in ILC. Underestimation of tumor size by US was significantly more frequent in ILC (5.4 +/- 12.2 mm) than in TOD (1.4 +/- 12.0 mm) (p = 0.015). In summary, we found that histologic differentiation significantly influences ultrasonographic appearance of breast cancer. The underestimation of tumor size of ILC might compromise the operative strategy. (E-mail: watermann@frk.ukl.uni-freiburg.de) (C) 2005 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 174
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
American College of Radiology, 2003, ACR BREAST IMAGING R
[2]
[Anonymous], 1997, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[3]
[Anonymous], 1981, HIST TYP BREAST TUM
[4]
Bazzocchi M, 2000, Radiol Med, V100, P436
[5]
Multicentric and multifocal cancer: Whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation [J].
Berg, WA ;
Gilbreath, PL .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) :59-66
[6]
HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CANCER - A STUDY OF 1409 CASES OF WHICH 359 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED FOR 15 YEARS [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
RICHARDSON, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (03) :359-&
[7]
Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma [J].
Butler, RS ;
Venta, LA ;
Wiley, EL ;
Ellis, RL ;
Dempsey, PJ ;
Rubin, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (02) :325-330
[8]
Cawson J N, 2001, Australas Radiol, V45, P25, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00867.x
[9]
Ultrasonography of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast - Sonographic patterns and diagnostic value - Report of 102 cases [J].
Chapellier, C ;
Balu-Maestro, C ;
Bleuse, A ;
Ettore, F ;
Bruneton, JN .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2000, 24 (06) :333-336
[10]
MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF INVASIVE LOBULAR AND INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST - A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS [J].
CORNFORD, EJ ;
WILSON, ARM ;
ATHANASSIOU, E ;
ELLIS, IO ;
ELSTON, CW ;
BLAMEY, RW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (809) :450-453