Application of breast cancer risk prediction models in clinical practice

被引:129
作者
Domchek, SM
Eisen, A
Calzone, K
Stopfer, J
Blackwood, A
Weber, BL
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Canc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Abramson Family Canc Res Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Hamilton Reg Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2003.07.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer risk assessment provides an estimation of disease risk that can be used to guide management for women at all levels of risk. In addition, the likelihood that breast cancer risk is due to specific genetic susceptibility (such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations) can be determined. Recent developments have reinforced the clinical importance of breast cancer risk assessment. Tamoxifen chemoprevention as well as prevention studies such as the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene are available to women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. In addition, specific management strategies are now defined for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Risk may be assessed as the likelihood of developing breast cancer (using risk assessment models) or as the likelihood of detecting a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (using prior probability models). Each of the models has advantages and disadvantages, and all need to be interpreted in context. We review available risk assessment tools and discuss their application. As illustrated by clinical examples, optimal counseling may require the use of several models, as well as clinical judgment, to provide the most accurate and useful information to women and their families.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 601
页数:9
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Abeliovich D, 1997, AM J HUM GENET, V60, P505
[2]  
ANDERSON DE, 1985, CANCER, V56, P383, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<383::AID-CNCR2820560230>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-0
[4]   High frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish ovarian cancer patients, regardless of family history [J].
Beller, U ;
Halle, D ;
Catane, R ;
Kaufman, B ;
Hornreich, G ;
LevyLahad, E .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 67 (02) :123-126
[5]   BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes [J].
Berry, DA ;
Iversen, ES ;
Gudbjartsson, DF ;
Hiller, EH ;
Garber, JE ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Lerman, C ;
Watson, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Hughes, KS ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (11) :2701-2712
[6]   Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history [J].
Berry, DA ;
Parmigiani, G ;
Sanchez, J ;
Schildkraut, J ;
Winer, E .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (03) :227-238
[7]  
Blackwood A, 2001, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V69, P223
[8]  
Breast Canc Linkage Consortium, 1999, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V91, P1310
[9]   Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk [J].
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Seynaeve, C ;
Bartels, CCM ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Meijers-Heijboer, EJ ;
Crepin, CMG ;
van Geel, AN ;
Menke, M ;
Verhoog, LC ;
van den Ouweland, A ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Klijn, JGM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :924-930
[10]  
Brose MS, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1365, DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.18.1365