Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia

被引:372
作者
Aditian, Aril [1 ]
Kubota, Tetsuya [2 ]
Shinohara, Yoshinori [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Agroenvironm Sci Dept, Lab Forest Conservat & Eros Control, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Fac Agr, Forest Environm Dept, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
Ambon landslide susceptibility; Frequency ratio; Logistic regression; Artificial neural network; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; REMOTE-SENSING DATA; BIVARIATE STATISTICS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; ROCK MECHANICS; TURKEY; HAZARD; FUZZY; ZONATION; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.006
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate landslide causative factors in landslide susceptibility assessments and to compare landslide susceptibility models based on the bivariate frequency ratio (FR), multivariate logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural network (ANN). The majority of landslide occurrences in Ambon, Indonesia is induced by heavy rainfall events where slope failures occur mostly on steep slopes thereby endangering municipality areas at the base of the hills. Eight landslide causative factors were considered in the landslide susceptibility assessments. The causative factors were elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, proximity to stream network, lithology, density of geological boundaries, proximity to faults, and proximity to the road network. The output susceptibility maps were reclassified into five classes ranging from very low to very high susceptibility using Jenks natural breaks method. Twenty percent of all mapped landslides were used as the validation of the susceptibility models. The validity and the accuracy of each model were tested by calculating areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs), and the areas under the curve (AUC) for the success rate curves of FR, LR, and ANN were 0.688, 0.687, and 0.734, respectively. The AUC for the prediction rate curve of FR, LR, and ANN were 0.668, 0.667, and 0.717, respectively. All findings of the models show good results with the accuracy of all models being higher than 66%. The ANN method proved to be superior in explaining the relationship of landslide with each factor studied. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 111
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models [J].
Akgun, Aykut ;
Dag, Serhat ;
Bulut, Fikri .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2008, 54 (06) :1127-1143
[2]   Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey) [J].
Akgun, Aykut ;
Kincal, Cem ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2012, 184 (09) :5453-5470
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Landslide Science and Practice
[4]   The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan [J].
Ayalew, L ;
Yamagishi, H .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2005, 65 (1-2) :15-31
[5]   A country-wide spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility in Romania [J].
Balteanu, Dan ;
Chendes, Viorel ;
Sima, Mihaela ;
Enciu, Petru .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2010, 124 (3-4) :102-112
[6]  
Barredo J., 2000, SPAIN INT J APPL EAR, P9, DOI [10.1016/S0303-2434(00)85022-9, DOI 10.1016/S0303-2434(00)85022-9]
[7]  
BMKG, 2013, DAIL RAINF AMB
[8]  
BNPB, 2012, MULT DIS RISK MAPP A
[9]   A systematic review of landslide probability mapping using logistic regression [J].
Budimir, M. E. A. ;
Atkinson, P. M. ;
Lewis, H. G. .
LANDSLIDES, 2015, 12 (03) :419-436
[10]   Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard [J].
Carrara, A ;
Crosta, G ;
Frattini, P .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2003, 28 (10) :1125-1142