Can patient-, treatment- and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients?

被引:143
作者
Vrieling, C
Collette, L
Fourquet, A
Hoogenraad, WJ
Horiot, JC
Jager, JJ
Oei, SB
Peterse, HL
Pierart, M
Poortmans, PM
Struikmans, H
Van den Bogaert, W
Bartelink, H
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Eortc Data Ctr, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Inst Curie, Dept Radiotherapy, F-75248 Paris, France
[4] UMC St Radboud, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Ctr Georges Francois Leclerc, Dept Radiotherapy, F-21079 Dijon, France
[6] RTIL, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-6401 CX Heerlen, Netherlands
[7] DR B Verbeeten Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-5000 LA Tilburg, Netherlands
[8] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] UMC Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[10] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiotherapy, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
breast cancer; breast-conserving therapy; local recurrence; young age;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00123-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to identify patient-, tumour- or treatment-related factors associated with young age that might explain the higher risk of ipsilateral breast recurrence that occurs after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in young breast cancer patients. In the 'boost versus no boost trial', 5569 early-stage breast cancer patients were entered. All patients underwent tumorectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy. Patients having a microscopically complete excision were randomised between receiving no boost or a 16-Gy boost, while patients with a microscopically incomplete excision were randomised between receiving a boost dose of 10 or 26 Gy. The 5-year local control rate was 82% for patients less than or equal to 35 years, 85% for patients aged 36-40 years, 92% for patients 41-50 years, 96% for patients 51-60 years and 97% for patients > 60 years of age (P < 0.000 1). In young patients, the tumour was significantly larger and more often oestrogen and progesterone receptor-negative. Invasive carcinoma and the intraductal component were more often of a high grade. The intraductal component was more frequently incompletely resected in young patients. Re-excisions were performed more often (most probably due to a more frequent incomplete excision at the first attempt). The total volume of breast tissue removed at the tumorectomy was smaller in the younger patient group, even after including the volume removed during re-excision. When relating all these parameters (including age itself) to local control, the multivariate analysis stratified by treatment showed that age was the only independent prognostic factor for local control (P=0.0001). Including the boost treatment as a separate covariate, the analysis retained age and boost treatment as significant factors related to local control (P < 0.0001). It was shown that the boost dose significantly reduced the 5-year local recurrence rate from 7 to 4% for patients with a complete excision (P < 0.001). For patients 40 years of age or younger, the boost dose reduced the local recurrence rate from 20 to 10% (P=0.002). This large European Orgnaization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial demonstrated an increased local recurrence rate in young patients. Although several associations between patient, tumour and treatment factors and age were found, that might explain the high local recurrence rate in the younger patients, it appears that age itself and the boost dose were the only factors that were independently related to local control. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 944
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
[2]  
ALBAIN KS, 1994, MONOGR NATL CANC I, V16, P35
[3]   TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS AND FREQUENCIES [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1955, 11 (03) :375-386
[4]  
BAAK JPA, 1985, CANCER, V56, P374, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<374::AID-CNCR2820560229>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-9
[6]   THE IMPACT OF TUMOR SIZE AND HISTOLOGY ON LOCAL-CONTROL AFTER BREAST-CONSERVING THERAPY [J].
BARTELINK, H ;
BORGER, JH ;
VANDONGEN, JA ;
PETERSE, JL .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 11 (04) :297-303
[7]   Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. [J].
Bartelink, H ;
Horiot, J ;
Poortmans, P ;
Struikmans, H ;
Van den Bogaert, W ;
Barillot, I ;
Fourquet, A ;
Borger, J ;
Jager, J ;
Hoogenraad, W ;
Collette, L ;
Pierart, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (19) :1378-1387
[8]  
Blichert-Toft M, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P19
[9]   AGE AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN BREAST-CANCER - RELATIONSHIP TO PATHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGIC FEATURES [J].
BONNIER, P ;
ROMAIN, S ;
CHARPIN, C ;
LEJEUNE, C ;
TUBIANA, N ;
MARTIN, PM ;
PIANA, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 62 (02) :138-144
[10]   RISK-FACTORS IN BREAST-CONSERVATION THERAPY [J].
BORGER, J ;
KEMPERMAN, H ;
HART, A ;
PETERSE, H ;
VANDONGEN, J ;
BARTELINK, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (04) :653-660