Improved US visualization of the pancreatic tail with simethicone, water, and patient rotation

被引:8
作者
Abu-Yousef, MM [1 ]
El-Zein, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Radiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
contrast media; comparative studies; pancreas; US; simethicone; ultrasound; (US);
D O I
10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc37780
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of degassed water, simethicone, and patient rotation on ultrasonographic (US) visualization of the pancreatic tail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients in whom visualization of the pancreatic tail was poor at US were reevaluated in the upright position after ingesting 2 cups (500 mL) of water with 80 mg of simethicone followed by rotating three times on the examination table. In a few patients, the right posterior obligee position was used. Pancreatic tail visualization and disbursement of gastric gas were evaluated. Seventy patients who received 500 mt of distilled water only served as control subjects. RESULTS: Pancreatic tail visualization in patients versus control subjects was complete in 55 (79%) versus five (7%) of 70 patients and control subjects, partial in 10 (14%) versus 38 (54%), and not improved in five (7%) versus 27 (39%). The effect on diminishing gastric air was closely correlated with the degree of improved visualization in most patients. All patients tolerated the procedure well, with no side effects. The technique added a mean of 8 versus 5 minutes to the examination in patients versus control subjects. The full acoustic window effect of the simethicone-water mixture lasted approximately 10 minutes. CONCLUSION: The simethicone-water-rotation technique is simple, safe, inexpensive, and effective for improving pancreatic tail visualization in ambulatory patients and is superior to the use of water alone.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 785
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF 3 NON-INVASIVE TESTS FOR PANCREATIC DISEASE [J].
FOSTER, PN ;
MITCHELL, CJ ;
ROBERTSON, DRC ;
HAMILTON, I ;
IRVING, H ;
KELLEHER, J ;
LINTOTT, DJ ;
ROBINSON, PJ ;
AXON, ATR ;
LOSOWSKY, MS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6436) :13-16
[2]
Simethicone coated cellulose as an oral contrast agent for ultrasound of the upper abdomen [J].
Harisinghani, MG ;
Saini, S ;
Schima, W ;
McNicholas, M ;
Mueller, PR .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (03) :224-226
[3]
A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND OF THE PANCREAS [J].
HESSEL, SJ ;
SIEGELMAN, SS ;
MCNEIL, BJ ;
SANDERS, R ;
ADAMS, DF ;
ALDERSON, PO ;
FINBERG, HJ ;
ABRAMS, HL .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :129-133
[4]
JACOBSON P, 1978, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, V6, P353, DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870060520
[5]
KAMIN PD, 1980, CANCER, V46, P2410, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19801201)46:11<2410::AID-CNCR2820461118>3.0.CO
[6]
2-B
[7]
Preliminary cost-effectiveness evaluation of an oral sonographic contrast agent using a decision modeling technique [J].
LaFrance, ND ;
Brooks, K ;
Yin, DP ;
Parker, JR ;
Bensel, K ;
Macchi, D ;
LevToaff, AS .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 :S426-S431
[8]
Safety and efficacy of a new oral contrast agent for sonography: A phase II trial [J].
Lev-Toaff, AS ;
Langer, JE ;
Rubin, DL ;
Zelch, JV ;
Chong, WK ;
Barone, AE ;
Goldberg, BB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (02) :431-436
[9]
DOUBLE-CONTRAST UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL EXAMINATION - TECHNIQUE AND INTERPRETATION [J].
LEVINE, MS ;
RUBESIN, SE ;
HERLINGER, H ;
LAUFER, I .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (03) :593-602
[10]
CELLULOSE AS A GASTROINTESTINAL US CONTRAST AGENT [J].
LUND, PJ ;
FRITZ, TA ;
UNGER, EC ;
HUNT, RK ;
FULLER, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (03) :783-788