Soil physical properties and tomato yield and quality in alternative cropping systems

被引:61
作者
Colla, G
Mitchell, JP [1 ]
Joyce, BA
Huyck, LM
Wallender, WW
Temple, SR
Hsiao, TC
Poudel, DD
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Vegetable Crops, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Tuscia, Dept Crop Prod, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agron & Range Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2000.925924x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems (SAFS) Project has studied the transition to low-input and organic alternatives in California's Sacramento Valley. This project compares a 4-5 yr rotation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L,) followed by double-dropped bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L,) in the conventional system and oat (Avena sativa L.)-purple vetch (Vicia benghalensis L.) in the low-input and organic systems. A conventional 2-yr rotation (tomato-wheat) is also studied. In 1997 and 1998, we evaluated the transition to alternative systems on soil bulk density, water holding capacity, infiltration and storage, water use efficiency, and 'Brigade' tomato yield and quality. No differences in laboratory determinations of soil bulk density and water holding capacity were found; however, in situ water holding capacity was highest in the organic system, lowest in the conventional 4-yr rotation and intermediate in the low-input and conventional 2-yr rotations. In 1998, infiltration during 3-h irrigations was 0.028 m(3) m(-1) for the conventional, and 0.062 m(3) m(-1) and 0.065 m(3) m(-1) for the low-input and organic systems, respectively. Similar results were observed in 1997, The alternative systems required more water per irrigation for uniform application, resulting in higher soil water content in the organic systems throughout 1998, Evapotranspiration was higher in the conventional systems in both years relative to other systems. Tomato yields did not differ among systems in either year. Fruit quality was highest in the conventional 4-yr system.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 932
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ALJIBURY FK, 1970, CALIF AGR, V24, P10
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Alternative Agriculture
[3]  
BARRET DM, 1997, PROCESSING TOMATO VA
[4]   Winter cover and tillage influences on coastal plain cotton production [J].
Bauer, PJ ;
Busscher, WJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1996, 9 (01) :50-54
[5]  
*CAL CERT ORG FARM, 1995, CAL CERT ORG FARM CE
[6]  
CASSEL DK, 1986, AGRONOMY, V9, P901
[7]   Application of epic model to nitrogen cycling in irrigated processing tomatoes under different management systems [J].
Cavero, J ;
Plant, RE ;
Shennan, C ;
Williams, JR ;
Kiniry, JR ;
Benson, VW .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1998, 56 (04) :391-414
[8]   Nitrogen, weeds and water as yield-limiting factors in conventional, low-input, and organic tomato systems [J].
Clark, MS ;
Horwath, WR ;
Shennan, C ;
Scow, KM ;
Lantni, WT ;
Ferris, H .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 73 (03) :257-270
[9]   Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low-input farming practices [J].
Clark, MS ;
Horwath, WR ;
Shennan, C ;
Scow, KM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1998, 90 (05) :662-671
[10]   Responses of processing tomato to water regime and fertilization in Central Italy [J].
Colla, G ;
Casa, R ;
Lo Cascio, B ;
Saccardo, F ;
Temperini, O ;
Leoni, C .
SIXTH INTERNATIONAL ISHS SYMPOSIUM ON THE PROCESSING TOMATO - WORKSHOP ON IRRIGATION AND FERTIGATION OF PROCESSING TOMATO, 1999, (487) :531-535