Work-related changes in peak expiratory flow among laboratory animal workers

被引:10
作者
Hollander, A [1 ]
Heederik, D [1 ]
Brunekreef, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ Agr, Dept Environm Sci, Environm & Occupat Hlth Grp, NL-6700 AE Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
asthma; laboratory animals; occupational allergy; peak expiratory flow;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.98.11040929
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Laboratory animal workers are at risk of developing allergic symptoms, of which asthmatic symptoms are the most severe. The aim was to study the relationship between allergic symptoms due to working with rats and variability and changes in peak expiratory how (PEF), Several indices were used on the basis of the amplitude of the PEF or the differences in PEF between days with and without exposure to rat aeroallergens, Of the 398 rat workers, 73% completed PEF readings on at least 9 days, of whom 208 had PEF readings on working days with and without contact with animals. The overall prevalence rate of allergic symptoms (asthmatic, eye, nose and/or skin) among rat workers during the handling of rats was 17.3 %. Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 6.7%. The PEF of the workers who reported asthmatic symptoms due to working with rats decreased significantly on days working with the animals (difference between the minimum PEF averaged over working days with animals and over days without animals (Delta PEFmin-min) = -7.3 L.min(-1)), compared to the workers without symptoms (2.2 L.min(-1)). This effect was more pronounced among workers with a late asthmatic response, i.e. the presence of asthmatic symptoms several hours after working with rats (Delta PEF min-min = -11.6 L.min(-1)). Multiple regression analyses showed that only those with asthmatic symptoms several hours after working with rats and those with allergic symptoms had an increased Delta PEFmin-min. In addition, workers with asthmatic symptoms were also more likely to have a higher PEF variability than workers without asthmatic symptoms, However, no difference in PEF variability between days with and without animals contact was observed. This study shows that the peak expiratory flow of workers who reported asthmatic symptoms due to working with rats decreased significantly on days working with laboratory animals.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 936
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
AOYAMA K, 1992, BRIT J IND MED, V49, P41
[2]   PREVALENCE AND DIAGNOSIS OF LABORATORY-ANIMAL ALLERGY [J].
BEESON, MF ;
DEWDNEY, JM ;
EDWARDS, RG ;
LEE, D ;
ORR, RG .
CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1983, 13 (05) :433-442
[3]   PEF variability, bronchial responsiveness and their relation to allergy markers in a random population (20-70 yr) [J].
Boezen, HM ;
Postma, DS ;
Schouten, JP ;
Kerstjens, HAM ;
Rijcken, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 154 (01) :30-35
[4]   RELATION BETWEEN RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS, PULMONARY-FUNCTION AND PEAK FLOW VARIABILITY IN ADULTS [J].
BOEZEN, HM ;
SCHOUTEN, JP ;
POSTMA, DS ;
RIJCKEN, B .
THORAX, 1995, 50 (02) :121-126
[5]  
BURGE PS, 1993, OCCUP MED, V8, P279
[6]   DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA [J].
BURGE, PS .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1989, 19 (06) :649-652
[7]   DEFINITION AND DIAGNOSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA [J].
CARTIER, A .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1994, 7 (01) :153-160
[8]  
COCKCROFT A, 1981, LANCET, V1, P827
[9]   WORK-RELATED SYMPTOMS, SENSITIZATION, AND ESTIMATED EXPOSURE IN WORKERS NOT PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED TO LABORATORY RATS [J].
CULLINAN, P ;
LOWSON, D ;
NIEUWENHUIJSEN, MJ ;
GORDON, S ;
TEE, RD ;
VENABLES, KM ;
MCDONALD, JC ;
TAYLOR, AJN .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1994, 51 (09) :589-592
[10]  
EISEN EA, 1993, OCCUP MED, V8, P265