The patient-specific functional scale: Validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction

被引:324
作者
Westaway, MD [1 ]
Stratford, PW
Binkley, JM
机构
[1] Canadian Sport Rehab, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Appalachian Phys Therapy, Dahlonega, GA USA
关键词
functional status; clinical outcome; measurement;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.331
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Self-report measures of disability are being used more frequently to assess patients' outcomes in clinical practice. This study examines the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale when applied to persons with neck dysfunction. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale and Neck Disability Index were applied at the initial visit, within 72 hours of the initial visit, and following 1-4 weeks of treatment in 31 patients with cervical dysfunction. At the time of the initial visit, the clinician made an estimate of patients' prognoses on a five-point scale. This estimate served as an a priori construct for change: patients with better ratings would change more. The results demonstrate excellent reliability (R = .92), validity (r = .73-83 compared with the Neck Disability Index, and r = .52-.64 compared with the prognosis rating), and sensitivity to change (r = .79-.83 compared with Neck Disability Index change scores, and r = .46-.53 compared with the prognosis rating). No difference was found between the Patient-Specific Functional Scale and Neck Disability Index in their ability to detect change over time. The results of this study are consistent with previous investigations which have concluded that the Patient-Specific Functional Scale is an efficient and valid measure for assessing disability and change in disability in persons with low back pain and knee dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 338
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
BAKER DJ, 1989, BACK PAIN NEW APPROA, P175
[2]
THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[3]
Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments [J].
Beurskens, AJHM ;
deVet, HCW ;
Koke, AJA .
PAIN, 1996, 65 (01) :71-76
[4]
The patient-specific functional scale: Measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction [J].
Chatman, AB ;
Hyams, SP ;
Neel, JM ;
Binkley, JM ;
Stratford, PW ;
Schomberg, A ;
Stabler, M .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1997, 77 (08) :820-829
[5]
THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - AN OUTCOME MEASURE SUITABLE FOR ROUTINE USE WITHIN THE NHS [J].
GARRATT, AM ;
RUTA, DA ;
ABDALLA, MI ;
BUCKINGHAM, JK ;
RUSSELL, IT .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6890) :1440-1444
[6]
Kleinbaum D., 1987, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
[7]
SPINE UPDATE - FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY SCALES FOR BACK PAIN [J].
KOPEC, JA ;
ESDAILE, JM .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (17) :1943-1949
[8]
THE QUEBEC BACK PAIN DISABILITY SCALE - MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES [J].
KOPEC, JA ;
ESDAILE, JM ;
ABRAHAMOWICZ, M ;
ABENHAIM, L ;
WOODDAUPHINEE, S ;
LAMPING, DL ;
WILLIAMS, JI .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (03) :341-352
[9]
LANKHORST GJ, 1982, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V14, P21
[10]
THE ACCURACY OF REMEMBERING CHRONIC PAIN [J].
LINTON, SJ ;
MELIN, L .
PAIN, 1982, 13 (03) :281-285