Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: Uses, abuses, and implications

被引:129
作者
Cameron, BD [1 ]
机构
[1] Ryerson Univ, Lib, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1353/pla.2005.0003
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Librarians rely on the Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factor as a tool for selecting periodicals, primarily in scientific disciplines. A current trend is to use this data as a means for evaluating the performance of departments, institutions, and even researchers in academic institutions-a process that is now being tied to tenure and promotion-despite the fact that such usage can be misleading and prejudicial. This paper will highlight the history of the development of impact factors, describe the limitations in their use, and provide a critique of the usage of impact factors in academic settings.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 125
页数:21
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Impact factors: Aiming at the wrong target [J].
Adams, KM .
CORTEX, 2001, 37 (04) :600-603
[2]  
*ASS RES LIB, 2004, MON SER COSTS ARL LI
[3]   Paper trail reveals references go unread by citing authors [J].
Ball, P .
NATURE, 2002, 420 (6916) :594-594
[4]  
Baylis M, 1999, NATURE, V401, P322, DOI 10.1038/43768-c1
[5]   The ups and downs of the impact factor:: The case of Archives of Medical Research [J].
Benítez-Bribiesca, L .
ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (02) :91-94
[6]  
Bonitz M, 2002, LIBR TRENDS, V50, P440
[7]  
Borgman CL, 2002, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V36, P3
[8]  
Brodman E, 1944, Bull Med Libr Assoc, V32, P479
[9]  
BURY L, 2002, BOOKSELLER, V5043, P5
[10]   ITALIAN PROFESSORSHIPS [J].
CALZA, L ;
GARBISA, S .
NATURE, 1995, 374 (6522) :492-492