Validation of a decision regret scale

被引:1106
作者
Brehaut, JC
O'Connor, AM
Wood, TJ
Hack, TF
Siminoff, L
Gordon, E
Feldman-Stewart, D
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Med Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Manitoba, Fac Nursing, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Loyola Univ, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[7] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
regret; patient decisions; validation; decision making; scale; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STERILIZATION REGRET; EMOTIONAL-REACTIONS; WOMEN; RESPONSIBILITY; EXPERIENCE; STATES; CONSOLIDATION; CONSEQUENCES; MENOPAUSE;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X03256005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Background. As patients become more involved in health care decisions, there may be greater opportunity for decision regret. The authors could not find a validated, reliable tool for measuring regret after health care decisions. Methods. A 5-item scale was administered to 4 patient groups making different health care decisions. Convergent validity was determined by examining the scale's correlation with satisfaction measures, decisional conflict, and health outcome measures. Results. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 to 0.92). It correlated strongly with decision satisfaction (r = -0.40 to -0.60), decisional conflict (r = 0.31 to 0.52), and overall rated quality of life (r = -0.25 to 0.27). Groups differing on feelings about a decision also differed on rated regret: F(2, 190) = 31.1, P < 0.001. Regret was greater among those who changed their decisions than those who did not, t(175)= 16.11, P < 0.001. Conclusions. The scale is a useful indicator of health care decision regret at a given point in time.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 292
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]
THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]
[Anonymous], THEORY DECISION
[3]
FORMING IMPRESSIONS OF PERSONALITY [J].
ASCH, SE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1946, 41 (03) :258-290
[4]
Barry M.J., 1997, DIS MANAGEMENT CLIN, V1, P5
[5]
REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) :961-981
[6]
LOTTERY WINNERS AND ACCIDENT VICTIMS - IS HAPPINESS RELATIVE [J].
BRICKMAN, P ;
COATES, D ;
JANOFFBULMAN, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 36 (08) :917-927
[7]
Living with treatment decisions: Regrets and quality of life among men treated for metastatic prostate cancer [J].
Clark, JA ;
Wray, NP ;
Ashton, CM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (01) :72-80
[8]
Dimensions of quality of life expressed by men treated for metastatic prostate cancer [J].
Clark, JA ;
Wray, N ;
Brody, B ;
Ashton, C ;
Giesler, B ;
Watkins, H .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (08) :1299-1309
[9]
Regret and responsibility in the evaluation of decision outcomes [J].
Connolly, T ;
Ordonez, LD ;
Coughlan, R .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 70 (01) :73-85
[10]
Regret in decision making [J].
Connolly, T ;
Zeelenberg, M .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (06) :212-216