Planning theories and environmental impact assessment

被引:88
作者
Lawrence, DP [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Environm, Langley, BC V3A 4R8, Canada
关键词
EIA; planning theory; theory building and practice;
D O I
10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00036-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The limited and sporadic interaction between EIA and planning theory has meant that EIA has largely failed to benefit from planning theory insights and lessons. Obstacles and dilemmas already encountered and addressed in planning theory are still hampering EIA theory building and practice. An overview of the characteristics, strengths, and limitations of five major planning theories-rationalism, pragmatism, socio-ecological idealism (SEI), political-economic mobilization (PEM), and communications and collaboration (CC) is presented in an effort to ameliorate this problem. EIA parallels to each planning theory and lessons for EIA are identified. Also addressed are the application of planning theories to different context types, overlaps, interconnections and middle ground concepts among theories, the integration of values, ethics, and postmodern perspectives and the potential to construct composite theories. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 625
页数:19
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   THE NON-EUCLIDEAN MODE OF PLANNING - WHAT IS IT TO BE [J].
ALEXANDER, ER .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1994, 60 (03) :372-376
[2]  
[Anonymous], IMPACT ASSESS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, LEARNING PLAN PLANNI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Geography of Nowhere
[5]  
[Anonymous], CITIES TOMORROW
[6]  
[Anonymous], ARGUMENTATIVE TURN P
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1989, CONDITIONS POSTMODER
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, DOI DOI 10.1016/0195-9255(90)90005-K
[10]  
[Anonymous], ENVIRONMENTS