Determining ammonia emissions from a cattle feedlot with an inverse dispersion technique

被引:153
作者
Flesch, T. K. [1 ]
Wilson, J. D.
Harper, L. A.
Todd, R. W.
Cole, N. A.
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Poultry Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Bushland, TX USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
trace gas fluxes; atmospheric dispersion; atmospheric deposition; ammonia fluxes; lagrangian stochastic models; inverse dispersion;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.02.006
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
An inverse-dispersion technique is used to calculate ammonia (NH3) gas emissions from a cattle feedlot. The technique relies on a simple backward Lagrangian stochastic (bLS) dispersion model to relate atmospheric NH3 concentration to the emission rate Q(bLS). Because the wind and the source configuration are complicated, the optimal implementation of the technique is unclear. Two categorically different measurement locations (for concentration and winds) are considered: within the feedlot and downwind. The in-feedlot location proved superior, giving a nearly continuous QbLS timeseries. We found average emissions of 0.15 kg NH3 animal(-1) day(-1) in both 2004 and 2005, representing a loss of 63% (2004) or 65% (2005) of the dietary nitrogen in the animal feed. Downwind measurement locations were less useful for several reasons: a narrow range of useable wind directions; ambiguity in the choice of wind statistics to use in the calculations; low NH3 concentrations; and downwind deposition of NH3. When addressing a large source (like a feedlot) that modifies the ambient wind flow, we recommend in-source measurements for use in inverse-dispersion applications. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 155
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A VARIABLE-RESOLUTION TRANSPORT MODEL APPLIED FOR NHX IN EUROPE [J].
ASMAN, WAH ;
VANJAARSVELD, HA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (03) :445-464
[2]  
Baker J.M., 2005, AGRONOMY MONOGRAPH, P345, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR47.C15
[3]  
Bierman S, 1999, J ANIM SCI, V77, P1645
[4]   Effect of low and high forage diet on enteric and manure pack greenhouse gas emissions from a feedlot [J].
Boadi, DA ;
Wittenberg, KM ;
Scott, SL ;
Burton, D ;
Buckley, K ;
Small, JA ;
Ominski, KH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 84 (03) :445-453
[5]   DYNAMICS OF AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION DURING FURROW IRRIGATION OF MAIZE [J].
DENMEAD, OT ;
FRENEY, JR ;
SIMPSON, JR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (01) :149-155
[6]  
DENMEAD OT, 1993, AGR ECOSYSTEM EFFECT
[7]  
Dyer A. J., 1974, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, V7, P363, DOI 10.1007/BF00240838
[8]  
ERICKSON GT, 1999, EFFECTS MATCHING PRO
[9]   Wet corn gluten feed and alfalfa hay levels in dry-rolled corn finishing diets: Effects on finishing performance and feedlot nitrogen mass balance [J].
Farran, TB ;
Erickson, GE ;
Klopfenstein, TJ ;
Macken, CN ;
Lindquist, RU .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 (05) :1205-1214
[10]   Estimating gas emissions from a farm with an inverse-dispersion technique [J].
Flesch, TK ;
Wilson, JD ;
Harper, LA ;
Crenna, BP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (27) :4863-4874