Evaluation of the Oxoid Aura image system for measuring zones of inhibition with the disc diffusion technique

被引:21
作者
Andrews, JM [1 ]
Boswell, FJ [1 ]
Wise, R [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hosp, NHS Trust, Dept Microbiol, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/46.4.535
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
In this study the Oxoid Aura image antibiotic sensitivity test system, used as a stand-alone device, was compared with manual zone measurement and use of a template, for the determination of sensitivities. An overall correlation coefficient of 0.99 was observed for zone diameters measured using the Aura image system and zones measured manually, when the differences between zones were within 3 mm; 5.4% of zones showed a difference in zone diameter between manual and automated measurement of >3 mm. The results obtained using the template method for interpretation were less reliable than zone measurement, with cefuroxime and ampicillin tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. When linked to a laboratory patient database, the bar code and disc identification facilities avoided errors that were associated with manual data entry.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 540
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
*BRIT SOC ANT CHEM, 1998, NEWSL BRIT SOC ANT S
[3]   AMANTADINE PROPHYLAXIS FOR HEALTH-CARE WORKERS - UNANSWERED QUESTIONS [J].
COX, RA .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 27 (01) :1-3
[4]  
DESAINTONGE DMC, 1974, LANCET, V1, P120
[5]  
HADDADPROST L, 1999, CLIN MICROBIOL INFEC, V5, P92
[6]  
STOKES EJ, 1972, ASS CLIN PATHOLOGIST, V55
[7]  
WESTGARD JO, 1977, CLIN CHEM, V23, P1857