Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health

被引:212
作者
Anderson, James G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
electronic health; electronic health record; E-health; information systems; delivery of health care; legal and ethical issues; implementation; organizational change;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: information technology such as electronic medical records (EMRs), electronic prescribing and decision support systems are recognized as essential tools in Europe, the U.S., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. But significant barriers impede wide-scale adoption of these tools, especially EMR systems. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to investigate the present status of information technology in health care, the perceived benefits and barriers by primary care physicians. Methods: Literature analysis and survey data from primary care physicians on adoption of information technology are reviewed. Results: The U.S. trails European countries as well as Canada, Australia and New Zealand in the use of information technology in primary care. The results of the study indicate that physicians in general perceive benefits to information technology, but also cite major barriers to its implementation in their practices. These barriers include lack of access to capital by health care providers, complex systems and lack of data standards that permit exchange of clinical data, privacy concerns and legal barriers. Conclusions: Overcoming these barriers will require subsidies and performance incentives by payers and government; certification and standardization of vendor applications that permit clinical data exchange; removal of legal barriers; and greater security of medical data to convince practitioners and patients of the value of EMRs. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 483
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Computerization of Primary Care in the United States [J].
Anderson, James G. ;
Balas, E. Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS, 2006, 1 (03) :1-23
[2]  
[Anonymous], REV HLTH CAR INF TEC
[3]   Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records [J].
Bates, DW .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (05) :1180-1189
[4]   Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors [J].
Bates, DW ;
Leape, LL ;
Cullen, DJ ;
Laird, N ;
Petersen, LA ;
Teich, JM ;
Burdick, E ;
Hickey, M ;
Kleefield, S ;
Shea, B ;
Vander Vliet, M ;
Seger, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (15) :1311-1316
[5]  
DASH E, 2005, NY TIMES 0807, P1
[6]  
Dick RS., 1997, The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care
[7]   A trial of automated decision support alerts for contraindicated medications using computerized physician order entry [J].
Galanter, WL ;
Didomenico, RJ ;
Polikaitis, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 12 (03) :269-274
[8]   Federal health information policy: A case of arrested development [J].
Goldsmith, J ;
Blumenthal, D ;
Rishel, W .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (04) :44-55
[9]  
*HARR INT, 2002, HARR INT HLTH CAR NE, V2, P8
[10]   Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs [J].
Hillestad, R ;
Bigelow, J ;
Bower, A ;
Girosi, F ;
Meili, R ;
Scoville, R ;
Taylor, R .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (05) :1103-1117