Applying decision-making tools to national e-waste recycling policy: An example of Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:35
作者
Lin, Chun-hsu [1 ]
Wen, Lihchyi [1 ]
Tsai, Yue-mi [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Hua Inst Econ Res, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Community Agr Recreat & Resource Study, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Consumer behavior - Electronic Waste - Recycling - Analytic hierarchy process - Cellular telephones - Decision making - Environmental protection;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As policy making is in essence a process of discussion, decision-making tools have in many cases been proposed to resolve the differences of opinion among the different parties. In our project that sought to promote a country's performance in recycling, we used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the possibilities and determine the priority of the addition of new mandatory recycled waste, also referred to as Due Recycled Wastes, from candidate waste appliances. The evaluation process started with the collection of data based on telephone interviews and field investigations to understand the behavior of consumers as well as their overall opinions regarding the disposal of certain waste appliances. With the data serving as background information, the research team then implemented the Analytic Hierarchy Process using the information that formed an incomplete hierarchy structure in order to determine the priority for recycling. Since the number of objects to be evaluated exceeded the number that the AHP researchers had suggested, we reclassified the objects into four groups and added one more level of pair-wise comparisons, which substantially reduced the inconsistency in the judgment of the AHP participants. The project was found to serve as a flexible and achievable application of AHP to the environmental policy-making process. In addition, based on the project's outcomes derived from the project as a whole, the research team drew conclusions regarding the government's need to take back 15 of the items evaluated, and suggested instruments that could be used or recycling regulations that could be changed in the future. Further analysis on the top three items recommended by the results of the evaluation for recycling, namely, Compact Disks, Cellular Phones and Computer Keyboards, was then conducted to clarify their concrete feasibility. After the trial period for recycling ordered by the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration, only Computer Keyboards were referred to as the new Due Recycled Waste and their producers started to take responsibility for recycling them from 2007 onwards. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 869
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Management and performance of Taiwan's waste recycling fund [J].
Fan, KS ;
Lin, CH ;
Chang, TC .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2005, 55 (05) :574-582
[2]   WEEE recovery strategies and the WEEE treatment status in China [J].
He, Wenzhi ;
Li, Guangming ;
Ma, Xingfa ;
Wang, Hua ;
Huang, Juwen ;
Xu, Min ;
Huang, Chunjie .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 136 (03) :502-512
[3]  
Kumar P., 2007, International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, Chennai, India, P148
[4]  
LIN C, 2004, FEASIBILITY ANAL EXP
[5]  
Saaty T.L., 1982, The Logic of Priorities
[6]   HOW TO MAKE A DECISION - THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
SAATY, TL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) :9-26
[7]   SCALING METHOD FOR PRIORITIES IN HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES [J].
SAATY, TL .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 15 (03) :234-281
[8]  
Saaty TL., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[9]  
*TAIW EPA, 2005, TAIW ENV PROT YB YEA
[10]   COMBINING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE FACTORS - AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY APPROACH [J].
WEDLEY, WC .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1990, 24 (01) :57-64