Carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients undergoing direct percutaneous coronary interventions for myocardial infarction:: Effects on QT dynamicity

被引:7
作者
Bonnemeier, H
Ortak, J
Tölg, R
Witt, M
Schmidt, J
Wiegand, UKH
Bode, F
Schunkert, H
Richardt, G
机构
[1] Med Univ Lubeck, Med Klin 2, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Herzzentrum Segeberger Klin, Bad Segeberg, Germany
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2005年 / 28卷
关键词
myocardial infarction; QT dynamicity; beta-adrenergic blockers; angioplasty;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00013.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Beta-adrenergic blockers exert significant antiarrhythmic activity during ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the beneficial effects conferred by alpho-1-adrenoceptor blockade on ventricular repolarization dynamicity in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI), we compared carvedilol with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomized to metoprolol 200 mg/day versus carvedilol 25 mg/day, The first oral dose of study drug was administered and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram recorded upon hospital admission. Slopes of the linear QT/RR regression were determined before and after reperfusion. A total of 38 recordings of patients treated with metoprolol and 34 recordings of patients with carvedilol were eligible for analysis of QT/RR slopes. The two study groups were similar with respect to age, gender, TIMI perfusion grades, ventricular function, duration of ischemia, and site and size of infarction. Mean RR- and QT-intervals were similar to the metoprolol and carvedilol groups, before and after PCI. Likewise, there was no significant difference in QT/RR slopes between the metoprolol and carvedilol groups before PCI. In contrast, after PCI, there was a trend toward lower QT/RR slopes in the metoprolol group (from 0.18 +/- 0.07 to 0.17 +/- 0.08), and a significant decrease in QT/RR slopes in the carvedilol group (from 0.17 +/- 0.07 to 0.14 +/- 0.09). In patients undergoing successful direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a significant decrease in QT-RR slopes, suggesting greater cardiac electrical stability.
引用
收藏
页码:S217 / S221
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Impact of infarct-related artery flow on QT dynamicity in patients undergoing direct percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction [J].
Bonnemeier, H ;
Wiegand, UKH ;
Bode, F ;
Hartmann, F ;
Kurowski, V ;
Katus, HA ;
Richardt, G .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (24) :2979-2986
[2]   Course and prognostic implications of QT interval and QT interval variability after primary coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Bonnemeier, H ;
Hartmann, F ;
Wiegand, UKH ;
Bode, F ;
Katus, HA ;
Richardt, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (01) :44-50
[3]   QT dynamicity and sudden death after myocardial infarction:: Results of a long-term follow-up study [J].
Chevalier, P ;
Burri, H ;
Adeleine, P ;
Kirkorian, G ;
Lopez, M ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
André-Fouët, X ;
Chapon, P ;
Rubel, P ;
Touboul, P .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (03) :227-233
[4]   Persistant reduction of mortality for five years after one year of acebutolol treatment initiated during acute myocardial infarction [J].
Cucherat, M ;
Boissel, JP ;
Leizorovicz, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (05) :587-589
[5]   Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial [J].
Dargie, HJ ;
Colucci, Y ;
Ford, I ;
Sendon, JLL ;
Remme, W ;
Sharpe, N ;
Blank, A ;
Holcslaw, TL .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9266) :1385-1390
[6]  
FRIEDMAN LM, 1982, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V247, P1707
[7]  
HJALMARSON A, 1981, LANCET, V2, P8233
[8]  
HOHER M, 1989, Z KARDIOL, V78, P7
[9]   ALPHA1-ADRENERGIC SYSTEM AND ARRHYTHMIAS IN ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE [J].
KURZ, T ;
YAMADA, KA ;
DATORRE, SD ;
CORR, PB .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 12 :88-98
[10]  
PEDERSEN TR, 1981, NEW ENGL J MED, V304, P801