Investment and emission control under technology and pollution externalities

被引:19
作者
Heal, Geoffrey [2 ]
Tarui, Nori [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Econ, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
International environmental agreement; Pollution abatement costs; Endogenous technological change; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.07.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies incentives to develop advanced pollution abatement technology when technology may spillover across agents and pollution abatement is a public good. We are motivated by a variety of pollution control issues where solutions require the development and implementation of new pollution abatement technologies. We show that at the Nash equilibrium of a simultaneous-move game with R&D investment and emission abatement, whether the free rider effect prevails and under-investment and excess emissions occur depends on the degree of technology spillovers and the effect of R&D on the marginal abatement costs. There are cases in which, contrary to conventional wisdom, Nash equilibrium investments in emissions reductions exceed the first-best case. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 14832 NBER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EC CLIMATE CHANGE ST, DOI DOI 10.1378/CHEST.128.5
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U WASHINGTON
[4]   Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement [J].
Baker, Erin ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Shittu, Ekundayo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (06) :2799-2816
[5]   Optimal technology R&D in the face of climate uncertainty [J].
Baker, Erin ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Weyant, John .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 78 (01) :157-179
[6]  
BARRETT S, 1992, COLUMBIA J WORLD BUS, V27, P202
[7]  
Barrett Scott., 2003, Environment Statecraft
[8]  
BRECHET T, 2006, 3 WORLD C ENV RES EC
[9]  
BUCHNER B, 2002, 222002 FEEM
[10]  
Carraro Carlo., 1997, International Environmental Negotiations