Identifying effective and/or safe doses by stepwise confidence intervals for ratios

被引:21
作者
Bretz, F
Hothorn, LA
Hsu, JC
机构
[1] Univ Hannover, LG Bioinformat, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Stat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
stepwise confidence intervals; ratios; therapeutic window; partitioning principle; multiple testing;
D O I
10.1002/sim.1449
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Typical randomized clinical dose-finding studies consist of the comparison of several doses of a drug versus a placebo. Interest lies in estimating relevant doses among those under investigation for efficacy and safety variables, such as the minimum effective dose or the maximum safe dose (or estimating both doses simultaneously). Step-down procedures have been proposed for comparing the standardized differences of the dose groups against placebo. In this paper we consider the ratio of population means and propose stepwise confidence intervals for these ratios. These confidence intervals do not require multiplicity adjustments and yield the same decisions as the associated test procedures. In addition, several power concepts are investigated within the present framework. The results allow sample size determination in the design phase of a study for the probability of estimating correctly the dose of interest. Auxiliary results of a numerical study show the range of application of these methods. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 858
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   On small-sample confidence intervals for parameters in discrete distributions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Min, YY .
BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (03) :963-971
[2]   A note on multiple testing procedures in dose finding [J].
Bauer, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (03) :1125-1128
[3]  
Bauer P, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2133, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2133::AID-SIM901>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-2
[5]  
Bauer P, 2001, BIOMETRICAL J, V43, P605, DOI 10.1002/1521-4036(200109)43:5<605::AID-BIMJ605>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-V
[7]   Interval estimation for a binomial proportion - Comment - Rejoinder [J].
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A ;
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA ;
Casella, G ;
Corcoran, C ;
Mehta, C ;
Ghosh, M ;
Santner, TJ ;
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 16 (02) :101-133
[8]  
FIELLER EC, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P175
[9]   European study on dose-response relationship of acarbose as a first-line drug in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: efficacy and safety of low and high doses [J].
Fischer, S ;
Hanefeld, M ;
Spengler, M ;
Boehme, K ;
Temelkova-Kurktschiev, T .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 1998, 35 (01) :34-40
[10]   APPROXIMATE INTERVAL ESTIMATION OF THE RATIO OF BINOMIAL PARAMETERS - A REVIEW AND CORRECTIONS FOR SKEWNESS [J].
GART, JJ ;
NAM, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (02) :323-338