Acute respiratory responses of the mouse to chlorine

被引:45
作者
Morris, JB
Wilkie, WS
Shusterman, DJ
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Toxicol Program, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, San Francisco, CA 94804 USA
关键词
chlorine; upper respiratory tract; nose;
D O I
10.1093/toxsci/kfi038
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
In human subjects 15-min exposure to 0.5-1.0 ppm chlorine gas causes a nasal obstructive response in the absence of a marked sensation of irritation. The current investigation was designed to assess the response of the mouse for comparative purposes. Respiratory physiological responses were measured in female C57B1/6J mice exposed to 0.8 to 4.0 ppm chlorine gas. Chlorine was a potent sensory irritant with an RD50 of 2.3 ppm. The gas produced airway obstruction as indicated by a concentration-dependent increase in specific airways resistance (sRaw) during the 15-min exposure. At 0.8 ppm, chlorine produced only mild sensory irritation (<20% change in breathing frequency) and a 65% increase in sRaw. Pretreatment with atropine was without effect on the obstructive response, suggesting a lack of involvement of muscarinic cholinergic pathways. Pretreatment with the sensory nerve toxin, capsaicin, dramatically reduced both the sensory irritation and obstructive responses to chlorine, suggesting the involvement of sensory nerves. Studies were also performed using the surgically isolated upper respiratory tract of the anesthetized mouse. Chlorine was efficiently scrubbed from the airstream (>97%) in that site and produced an obstructive response that was of sufficient magnitude to account for the entire response observed in the intact animal. In summary, chlorine gas produces an immediate nasal obstructive response in the mouse that appears to be similar to that in the human.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 387
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] BIOASSAY FOR EVALUATING THE POTENCY OF AIRBORNE SENSORY IRRITANTS AND PREDICTING ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF EXPOSURE IN MAN
    ALARIE, Y
    [J]. FOOD AND COSMETICS TOXICOLOGY, 1981, 19 (05): : 623 - 626
  • [2] Alarie Y, 1973, CRC Crit Rev Toxicol, V2, P299, DOI 10.3109/10408447309082020
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1988, ANN OCCUP HYG, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ANNHYG/32.INHALED_, DOI 10.1093/ANNHYG/32.INHALED_PARTICLES_VI.53]
  • [4] *ASTM, 1984, E98184 ASTM
  • [5] BARANIUK JN, 1994, CL ALLER IM, V4, P79
  • [6] COMPARISON OF SENSORY IRRITATION RESPONSE IN MICE TO CHLORINE AND HYDROGEN-CHLORIDE
    BARROW, CS
    ALARIE, Y
    WARRICK, JC
    STOCK, MF
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1977, 32 (02): : 68 - 76
  • [7] EVALUATION OF THE SENSORY IRRITATION TEST FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH RISK
    BOS, PMJ
    ZWART, A
    REUZEL, PGJ
    BRAGT, PC
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 21 (06) : 423 - 450
  • [8] AFFERENT VAGAL-C FIBER INNERVATION OF THE LUNGS AND AIRWAYS AND ITS FUNCTIONAL-SIGNIFICANCE
    COLERIDGE, JCG
    COLERIDGE, HM
    [J]. REVIEWS OF PHYSIOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 99 : 1 - 110
  • [9] COMPARISON OF THE SENSORY IRRITATION RESPONSE IN MICE TO CHLORINE AND NITROGEN TRICHLORIDE
    GAGNAIRE, F
    AZIM, S
    BONNET, P
    HECHT, G
    HERY, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 14 (06) : 405 - 409
  • [10] Indoor environmental exposures and symptoms
    Hodgson, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 110 : 663 - 667