The relationship between justice and attitudes: An examination of justice effects on event and system-related attitudes

被引:111
作者
Ambrose, Maureen
Hess, Ronald L.
Ganesan, Shankar
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Management, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Coll William & Mary, Dept Mkt, Williamsburg, VA USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Mkt, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
procedural justice; distributive justice; interpersonal justice; informational justice; attitudes; event evaluations; system-related evaluations; mediation;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research in organizational justice has always been interested in the relationship between justice and attitudes. This research often examines how different types of justice affect different attitudes, with distributive justice predicted to affect attitudes about specific events (e.g., performance evaluation) and procedural justice predicted to affect attitudes about organizations (e.g., organizational commitment). However, there is mixed support for these predictions. Moreover, this approach generally ignores the relationship between attitudes about the specific event and attitudes toward the organization. In this study we identify three alternative models of justice and attitudes. We use customer responses to complaint handling to test these alternative conceptualizations. Results generally support a mediated model, wherein event attitudes mediate the effect of justice perceptions on system-related attitudes. The implication of these findings for organizations and justice researchers are discussed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 36
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Ambrose ML, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P59
[2]   Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational, support, and supervisory trust [J].
Ambrose, ML ;
Schminke, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (02) :295-305
[3]  
[Anonymous], J SERVICE RES
[4]   Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model [J].
Aryee, S ;
Budhwar, PS ;
Chen, ZX .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (03) :267-285
[5]  
Bies R. J., 2001, Advances in organizationaljustice, P89
[6]  
Bies R.J., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X
[7]   THE SERVICE ENCOUNTER - DIAGNOSING FAVORABLE AND UNFAVORABLE INCIDENTS [J].
BITNER, MJ ;
BOOMS, BH ;
TETREAULT, MS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :71-84
[8]  
Brockner J., 1996, Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, P390
[9]  
Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
[10]  
CLEMMER EC, 1993, JUSTICE WORKPLACE AP, P197