Ultrasound markers of fetal chromosomal abnormality: a survey of policies and practices in UK maternity ultrasound departments

被引:12
作者
Maclachlan, N
Iskaros, J
Chitty, L
机构
[1] UCL, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[2] St Helier Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Jersey, England
关键词
fetal ultrasound; soft markers; screening for aneuploidy;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00122.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the management of Pregnancies where the fetus was found to have one or more sonographic markers of possible fetal chromosomal abnormality. Design Prospective anonymous postal survey of UK obstetric ultrasound units. Main outcome measures The management of pregnancies where the fetus is found to have a sonographic marker of aneuploidy. Population All 252 maternity ultrasound units in the United Kingdom. Methods Postal questionnaire to the superintendent sonographer in routine maternal ultrasound departments. Results Questionnaires were returned from 179 maternity units (71%). Of the respondents 94% offered a fetal anomaly scan at 16-20 weeks' gestation and 59% performed a dating scan at 10-14 weeks. Screening for Down syndrome was available in 99% of all maternity units. The recognition of sonographic 'soft signs' for possible fetal chromosomal abnormality varied considerably between the units. When sonographers were asked about their unit's policy regarding offering amniocentesis to women with sonographic markers, 8-78% discussed amniocentesis when the marker was isolated and 53-88% when another abnormality was found. Eighty nine percent of units documented the abnormal ultrasound findings in the hospital notes and 88% of the women were informed of the findings regardless of the intention to offer amniocentesis. Conclusion The practice of routine ultrasound examination is well established in UK, though precise policies vary. The existing wide variations in management policies possibly reflect a lack of data derived from low risk populations. There is a need to collect such data from low risk populations with Known screening practices so that national guidelines to standardize practice can be formulated.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 390
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BAILLIE C, 1998, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V105, P26
[2]   The incorporation of maternal age into the sonographic scoring index for the detection at 14-20 weeks of fetuses with Down's syndrome [J].
Bromley, B ;
Lieberman, E ;
Benacerraf, BR .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 10 (05) :321-324
[3]   Ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities [J].
Chitty, LS .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1995, 15 (13) :1241-1257
[4]   The significance of choroid plexus cysts in an unselected population: results of a multicenter study [J].
Chitty, LS ;
Chudleigh, P ;
Wright, E ;
Campbell, S ;
Pembrey, M .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :391-397
[5]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ROUTINE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN DETECTING FETAL STRUCTURAL ABNORMALITIES IN A LOW-RISK POPULATION [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
HUNT, GH ;
MOORE, J ;
LOBB, MO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6811) :1165-1169
[6]  
CHUDLEIGH P, 1984, PRENATAL DIAG, V4, P135, DOI 10.1002/pd.1970040207
[7]   Second-trimester minor ultrasound anomalies: Impact on the risk of aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age [J].
Drugan, A ;
Johnson, MP ;
Reichler, A ;
Hume, RF ;
ItskoviczEldor, J ;
Evans, MI .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (02) :203-206
[8]   CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF FETAL CHOROID-PLEXUS CYSTS [J].
GUPTA, JK ;
CAVE, M ;
LILFORD, RJ ;
FARRELL, TA ;
IRVING, HC ;
MASON, G ;
HAU, CM .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8977) :724-729
[9]   Counselling should be provided before parents are told of presence of ultrasonographic ''soft markers'' of fetal abnormality [J].
Mason, G ;
Baillie, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7101) :189-190
[10]   ULTRASONOGRAPHICALLY DETECTABLE MARKERS OF FETAL CHROMOSOMAL-ABNORMALITIES [J].
NICOLAIDES, KH ;
SNIJDERS, RJM ;
GOSDEN, CM ;
BERRY, C ;
CAMPBELL, S .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8821) :704-707