The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability

被引:297
作者
Paulhus, DL [1 ]
Harms, PD [1 ]
Bruce, MN [1 ]
Lysy, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Over-claiming is a concrete operalization of self-enhancement based on respondents' ratings of their knowledge of various persons, events, products, and so on. Because 20% of the items are nonexistent, responses can be analyzed with signal detection formulas to index both response bias (over-claiming) and accuracy (knowledge). Study 1, demonstrated convergence of over-claiming with alternative measures of self-enhancement but independence from cognitive ability. In Studies 2-3, the validity of the over-claiming index held even when respondents were (a) warned about the foils or (b) asked to fake goods Study 3 also showed the utility of the over-claiming index for diagnosing faking. In Study 4, the over-claiming technique was applied to the debate over the adaptive value of positive illusions.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 904
页数:15
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   PERSONAL CONTACT, INDIVIDUATION, AND THE BETTER-THAN-AVERAGE EFFECT [J].
ALICKE, MD ;
KLOTZ, ML ;
BREITENBECHER, DL ;
YURAK, TJ ;
VREDENBURG, DS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (05) :804-825
[2]   GLOBAL SELF-EVALUATION AS DETERMINED BY THE DESIRABILITY AND CONTROLLABILITY OF TRAIT ADJECTIVES [J].
ALICKE, MD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 49 (06) :1621-1630
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB PERSONALITY PSYC, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50025-1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1977, WONDERLIC PERSONNEL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1965, The challenge of response sets
[6]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL DEV
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, IMPRESSION MANAGEMEN
[8]  
BAER RA, IN PRESS ENCY PSYCHO
[9]  
BLOCK J, 1955, J Abnorm Psychol, V51, P254, DOI 10.1037/h0048246
[10]   IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness [J].
Block, J ;
Kremen, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (02) :349-361