A new methodology for evaluating coastal scenery: fuzzy logic systems

被引:108
作者
Ergin, A [1 ]
Karaesmen, E
Micallef, A
Williams, AT
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Malta, Fdn Int Studies, ICoD, Valletta, Malta
[3] Univ Glamorgan, Dept Appl Sci, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, M Glam, Wales
关键词
coastal scenery assessments; fuzzy logic; Turkey; UK; Malta;
D O I
10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00238.x
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Coastal scenery evaluated by utilization of selected landscape components was subjected to a fuzzy logic systems approach. Twenty-six top-rated parameters were identified from a literature search/questionnaire surveys carried out in Malta, Turkey and the UK and coastal scenery investigated at 57 sites. A coastal scenic evaluation checklist system was finalized and consisted of assessment parameters based on a five-point scale ranging from low to high attribute values. Coastal user parameter preferences and priorities for these parameters were obtained by a questionnaire perception study (n=270) given to both locals and visitors. Assessment parameter weights were calculated from this public perception survey via matrices relating to the selected landscape components. For each of the 26 parameters, a membership-graded matrix was established to counteract potential errors in assigning grades to the parameters when one has to give a unique number to the attribute value. To overcome subjectivity and quantify uncertainty, fuzzy logic mathematical methodology was adopted to this checklist approach. This enabled an Evaluation Index (D) value to be calculated, establishing a 5-class evaluation system. Class 1 scenery (extremely attractive natural site) had 0 values > 0.85; Class 2, between 0.85 and 0.65; Class 3, between 0.65 and 0.4; Class 4, between 0.4 and zero; Class 5 (very unattractive, intensively developed urban) below zero.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 386
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BEACH MANAGEMENT MED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1961, Public Opinion
[3]   LANDSCAPE EVALUATION - THEORETICAL VACUUM [J].
APPLETON, J .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 1975, (66) :120-123
[4]  
*BCR, 2003, COAST SCEN ASS SEL S
[5]  
BRIGGS DJ, 1980, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V10, P263
[6]   INTERVAL SCALING OF LANDSCAPE PREFERENCE BY DIRECT-MEASUREMENT AND INDIRECT-MEASUREMENT METHODS [J].
BUHYOFF, GJ ;
ARNDT, LK ;
PROPST, DB .
LANDSCAPE PLANNING, 1981, 8 (03) :257-267
[7]  
*CA SNR, 2002, LANDSC CHAR ASS GUID
[8]   POSSIBILITY OF QUANTIFYING SCENIC BEAUTY [J].
CARLSON, AA .
LANDSCAPE PLANNING, 1977, 4 (02) :131-172
[9]  
CCW, 1996, WELSH LANDSC OUR INH, V11
[10]  
CCW (Countryside Council for Wales), 2001, LANDMAP INF SYST, Vfirst