Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California's Mathematics Professional Development Institutes

被引:183
作者
Hill, HC [1 ]
Ball, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Learning Math Teaching Project, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
elementary; K-8; evaluation; policy issues; professional development; teacher knowledge;
D O I
10.2307/30034819
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Widespread agreement exists that U.S. teachers need improved mathematics knowledge for teaching. Over the past decade, policymakers have funded a range of professional development efforts designed to address this need. However, there has been little success in determining whether and when teachers develop mathematical knowledge from professional development, and if so, what features of professional development contribute to such teacher learning. This was due, in part, to a lack of measures of teachers' content knowledge for teaching mathematics. This article attempts to fill these gaps. In it we describe an effort to evaluate California's Mathematics Professional Development Institutes (MPDIs) using novel measures of knowledge for teaching mathematics. Our analyses showed that teachers participating in the MPDIs improved their performance on these measures during the extended summer workshop portion of their experience. This analysis also suggests that program length as measured in days in the summer workshop and workshop focus on mathematical analysis, reasoning, and communication predicted teachers' learning.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 351
页数:22
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STUDY PACKAGE EXAMIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GLOBE MAIL
[3]  
[Anonymous], RES MONOGRAPH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MATH ED TEACH, DOI DOI 10.1090/CBMATH/011
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1991, TEACHING ACAD SUBJEC
[8]  
Ball D., 2000, MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVE, P83
[9]  
Ball D.L., 1993, Rational numbers, P157
[10]  
Ball D.L., 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, V4th, P433, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-4-18