Financial liberalization and banking efficiency: evidence from Turkey

被引:40
作者
Denizer, Cevdet A.
Dinc, Mustafa
Tarimcilar, Murat
机构
[1] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC USA
关键词
banking; efficiency; liberalization; data envelopment analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11123-007-0035-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the banking efficiency in a pre- and post-liberalization environment by drawing on the Turkish experience by using DEA. The paper also investigates the scale effect on efficiency. Our findings suggest that liberalization programs were followed by an observable decline in efficiency. Another finding of the study is that the Turkish banking system had a serious scale problem during the study period. The second part of our analysis relied on econometric methods and found that one major reason for such system-wide efficiency decline has been the growing macroeconomic instability of the Turkish economy in general and financial sector in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 195
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   A PROCEDURE FOR RANKING EFFICIENT UNITS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSEN, P ;
PETERSEN, NC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1261-1265
[2]   The use of data envelopment analysis in banking institutions: Evidence from the Commercial Bank of Greece [J].
Athanassopoulos, AD ;
Giokas, D .
INTERFACES, 2000, 30 (02) :81-95
[3]  
Atiyas Izak, 1994, FINANCIAL REFORM THE
[4]  
AYDOGAN K, 1992, YENI FORUM, P23
[5]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[6]  
Banker RD, 1996, ANN OPER RES, V66, P233
[8]   ESTIMATION OF RETURNS TO SCALE USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
THRALL, RM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 62 (01) :74-84
[9]  
Barr RS., 1994, Recherches Economiques De Louvain/louvain Economic Review, V60, P417, DOI [10.1017/S0770451800004590, DOI 10.1017/S0770451800004590]
[10]  
Bauer P. W., 1998, J ECON BUS, V50, P85, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0148-6195(97)00072-6