Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration

被引:193
作者
Hall, JW
Tarantola, S
Bates, PD
Horritt, MS
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Protect & Secur Citizen, I-21020 Ispra, VA, Italy
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol BS8 1SS, Avon, England
来源
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2005年 / 131卷 / 02期
关键词
sensitivity analysis; calibration; validation; hydraulic models; flood plains;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:2(117)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Uncertainties in hydrodynamic model calibration and boundary conditions can have a significant influence on flood inundation predictions. Uncertainty analysis involves quantification of these uncertainties and their propagation through to inundation predictions. In this paper the inverse problem of sensitivity analysis is tackled. in order to diagnose the influence that model input variables. together and in combination, have on the uncertainty in the inundation model prediction. Variance-based global sensitivity analysis is applied to simulation of a flood on a reach of the River Thames (United Kingdom) for which a synthetic aperture radar image of the extent of flooding was available for model validation. The sensitivity analysis using the method of Sobol quantifies the significant influence of variance in the Manning channel roughness coefficient in raster-based flood inundation model predictions of flood outline and flood depth. The spatial influence of the Manning channel roughness coefficient is analyzed by dividing the channel into subreaches and calculating variance-based sensitivity indices for each subreach. Replicated Latin hypercube sampling is used for sensitivity analysis with correlated input variables. The methodology identifies subreaches of channel that have the most influence on variance in the model predictions. demonstrating how far boundary effects propagate into the model and indicating where further data acquisition and nested higher-resolution model studies should be targeted.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 126
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data [J].
Aronica, G ;
Hankin, B ;
Beven, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1998, 22 (04) :349-365
[2]   Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE [J].
Aronica, G ;
Bates, PD ;
Horritt, MS .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (10) :2001-2016
[3]   A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation [J].
Bates, PD ;
De Roo, APJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 236 (1-2) :54-77
[4]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[5]   Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment [J].
Beven, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2002, 458 (2026) :2465-2484
[6]   How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? [J].
Beven, K .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2001, 5 (01) :1-12
[7]   Tackling quantitatively large dimensionality problems [J].
Campolongo, F ;
Tarantola, S ;
Saltelli, A .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 117 (1-2) :75-85
[8]   Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation [J].
Crosetto, M ;
Tarantola, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2001, 15 (05) :415-437
[9]  
FRANCOS A, 2001, P 3 INT S SENS AN MO, P175
[10]   Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models [J].
Homma, T ;
Saltelli, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 52 (01) :1-17