Quality of care for elderly residents in nursing homes and elderly people living at home: controlled observational study

被引:134
作者
Fahey, T [1 ]
Montgomery, AA
Barnes, J
Protheroe, J
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Tayside Ctr Gen Practice, Dundee DD2 4AD, Scotland
[2] Univ Bristol, Div Primary Hlth Care, Bristol BS6 6JL, Avon, England
[3] Bradgate Surg, Bristol BS10 6SP, Avon, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Natl Primary Care Res & Dev Ctr, Manchester M13 6PL, Lancs, England
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2003年 / 326卷 / 7389期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.326.7389.580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives To assess the quality of care given to elderly people and compare the care given to residents in nursing homes with those living in their own homes. Design Controlled observational study. Setting Primary care, Bristol. Subjects Elderly individuals (aged greater than or equal to 65 years) registered with three general practices, of whom 172 were residents in nursing homes (cases) and 526 lived at home (matched controls). Main outcome measures The quality of clinical care given to patients was measured against explicit standards. Quality indicators were derived from national sources and agreed with participating general practitioners. Results The overall standard of care was inadequate when judged against the quality indicators, irrespective of where patients lived. The overall prescribing of beneficial drugs for some conditions was deficient-for example, only 38% (11/29) (95% confidence interval 20% to 58%) of patients were prescribed beta blockers after myocardial infarction. The proportion of patients with heart disease or diabetes who had had their blood pressure measured in the past two years (heart disease) or past year (diabetes) was lower among those living in nursing homes: for heart disease, 74% (17/23) v 96% (122/127) (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 0.04 to 0.75); for diabetes, 62% (8/13) v 96% (50/52) (adjusted odds ratio 0.05, 0.01 to 0.38). In terms of potentially harmful prescribing, significantly more patients in nursing homes were prescribed neuroleptic medication (28% (49/172) v 11% (56/526) (3.82, 2.37 to 6.17)) and laxatives (39% (67/172) v 16% (85/526) (2.79, 1.79 to 4.36)). Nursing home residents were less likely to have the appropriate diagnostic Read code linked to their prescribed neuroleptic drug (0.22, 0.07 to 0.71). Conclusions The quality of medical care that elderly patients receive in one UK city, particularly those in nursing homes, is inadequate. We suggest that better coordinated care for these patients would avoid the problems of overuse of unnecessary or harmful drugs, underuse of beneficial drugs, and poor monitoring of chronic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 583
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[2]
[Anonymous], 2001, IMPROVING QUALITY LO
[3]
Diabetes in institutionalised elderly people: A forgotten population? [J].
Benbow, SJ ;
Walsh, A ;
Gill, GV .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7098) :1868-1869
[4]
Community institutional care for frail elderly people - Time to structure professional responsibility [J].
Black, D ;
Bowman, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7106) :441-442
[5]
Quality of health care .2. Measuring quality of care [J].
Brook, RH ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Cleary, PD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :966-970
[6]
Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practice [J].
Campbell, NC ;
Thain, J ;
Deans, HG ;
Ritchie, LD ;
Rawles, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7142) :1430-1434
[7]
*COMM SAF MED, 2000, THIOR RESTR IND NEW
[8]
*EXP GROUP HEALTHC, 2002, ADD LIF YEARS
[9]
Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial [J].
Feder, G ;
Griffiths, C ;
Eldridge, S ;
Spence, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7197) :1522-1526
[10]
Gurvich T, 2000, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V61, P1437